Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGruhl, Jim
dc.contributor.authorSotak, Arthur E.
dc.date.accessioned2006-03-13T16:00:27Z
dc.date.available2006-03-13T16:00:27Z
dc.date.issued1978-07
dc.identifier.other04830534
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/31331
dc.description.abstractThis report lists and discusses the types of information that are necessary for making decisions about the allocation of R&D funds among various electric power related energy technologies. The discussion is divided into two parts: (1) the task of choosing among different technologies and (2) the task of guiding toward the most important specific projects within an individual technology. To choose among alternative energy technologies requires assumptive information, assessment infor- mation, probabilistic information, and techniques for quantifying the overall desirability of each alternative. Guidance toward the most important projects requires information about levels and uncertainties of certain performance measures and their importance relative to external thresholds or relative to the performance of competing technologies. Some simple examples are presented to illustrate the discussion. A bibliography of more than 200 important references in this field was compiled and is appended to this report.en
dc.description.sponsorshipSponsored by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Contract #68-02-2146.en
dc.format.extent3129491 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherMIT Energy Laboratoryen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT-ELen
dc.relation.ispartofseries78-030en
dc.subjectResearch and development contracts |z United States.en
dc.subjectTechnology assessment |z United States.en
dc.titleComparing advanced energy cycles and developing priorities for future R&Den
dc.typeTechnical Reporten


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record