Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStrang, Steven M.en_US
dc.coverage.temporalFall 2002en_US
dc.date.issued2002-12
dc.identifier21W.747-Fall2002
dc.identifierlocal: 21W.747
dc.identifierlocal: IMSCP-MD5-75275af8974c9fddc7e3069f59b58e4b
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/34882
dc.description.abstractFor students with a special interest in learning how to make forceful arguments in written form. Studies the forms and structures of argumentation, including organization of ideas, awareness of audience, methods of persuasion, evidence, factual vs emotional argument, figures of speech, and historical forms and uses of arguments. From the course home page: Course Description Introduction to 21W.747 This course is an introduction to the history, the theory, the practice, and the implications (both social and ethical) of rhetoric, the art and craft of persuasion. This semester, many of your skills will be deepened by practice, including your analytical skills, your critical thinking skills, your persuasive writing skills, and your oral presentation skills. In this course you will act as both a rhetor (a person who uses rhetoric) and a rhetorician (one who studies the art of rhetoric). Because the study of rhetoric has always had as one of its goals the creation of active and informed citizens and because rhetors write to influence the real world and thus to become agents of positive change, 21W.747 has an optional Service Learning (SL) component: You may elect to write/work for a non-profit organization that deals with some social issue. To offset the 20-30 hours during the semester that the SL option will involve, those who select it will substitute their non-profit writing for essay #4 or use their experiences there as the main source for one of their essays. Further, their experiences may be the basis for their final extemporaneous speech (thus reducing time spent on research). What is Rhetoric? Rhetoric is the art and craft of discourse; it is the study and creation of effective communication and persuasion. Studying rhetoric teaches us not only how to write persuasively but also how to understand the rhetorical efforts of others. Understanding rhetoric gives us the means of judging whose opinion about issues is the most accurate, useful, or valid, because such knowledge allows us to see beyond the persuasive techniques to the essence of the opinions. Further, understanding rhetoric is the best way of understanding the assumptions of and the points made by those who disagree with our positions. Further still, understanding rhetoric is the best way for us to deepen and refine our own positions and beliefs by exploring our own assumptions and our cultural contexts. In short, rhetoric teaches us how to find the limits of our own positions, how to argue effectively against others' positions, and how to create powerful and persuasive arguments for our own beliefs. At its best, rhetoric is used ethically by people of good will who wish to present their ideas forcibly but fairly to their communities. At its worst, however, rhetoric is used unethically by people to manipulate us instead of enlightening us, to spread propaganda instead of seeking truth, to make palatable those ideas and products whose adoption actually runs counter to our best interests. Understanding rhetoric, then, is our best defense against its abusers-- e.g., political "spin doctors," advertisers, demagogues, apologists for immoral business practices, and hate mongers. Using rhetoric in an ethical manner is our best method for becoming agents for positive change in our society.en_US
dc.format.extent19467 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent27543 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent61402 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent30984 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent35243 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent13344 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent16399 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent11 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent4586 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent18637 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent11602 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent18220 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent4755 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent27322 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent25313 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent4039 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent301 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent354 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent339 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent180 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent285 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent67 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent17685 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent49 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent143 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent247 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent19283 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent262 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent30758 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent47362 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent43031 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent103182 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent102883 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent93044 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent87560 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent86362 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent75667 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent88461 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent98341 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent145146 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent118046 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent66861 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent19283 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent3486 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent811 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent813 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent830 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent507 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent2097 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent23630 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent9838 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent10395 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent10360 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent9810 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent10385 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent9873 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent9691 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent10372 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent10330 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent10393 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent10331 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent10369 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent10330 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent9933 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent10368 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent9816 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent11062 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent10357 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent10330 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent9845 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent10402 bytesen_US
dc.languageen-USen_US
dc.rights.uriUsage Restrictions: This site (c) Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2003. Content within individual courses is (c) by the individual authors unless otherwise noted. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology is providing this Work (as defined below) under the terms of this Creative Commons public license ("CCPL" or "license"). The Work is protected by copyright and/or other applicable law. Any use of the work other than as authorized under this license is prohibited. By exercising any of the rights to the Work provided here, You (as defined below) accept and agree to be bound by the terms of this license. The Licensor, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, grants You the rights contained here in consideration of Your acceptance of such terms and conditions.en_US
dc.subjectethicsen_US
dc.subjectrhetoricen_US
dc.subjectpersuasionen_US
dc.subjectanalytical skillsen_US
dc.subjectcritical thinkingen_US
dc.subjectpersuasive writingen_US
dc.subjectoral presentationen_US
dc.subjectRhetoricen_US
dc.title21W.747 Rhetoric, Fall 2002en_US
dc.title.alternativeRhetoricen_US
dc.typeLearning Object
dc.contributor.departmentMIT Program in Writing & Humanistic Studies


Files in this item

No Thumbnail [100%x160]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record