Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKarimi, Roohollah
dc.date.accessioned2006-12-19T15:44:50Z
dc.date.available2006-12-19T15:44:50Z
dc.date.issued1980-05
dc.identifier.other06849216
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/35139
dc.description.abstractA code has been developed for the comprehensive analysis of a fault tree.' The code designated UNRAC (UNReliability Analysis Code) calculates the following characteristics of an Tnput fauTt tree: a) minimal cut sets, b) top event unavailability as point estimate and/or in time dependent form, c) quantitative importance of each component involved, and d) error bound on the top event unavailability UNRAC can analyze fault trees, with any kind of gates (EOR, NAND, NOR, AND, OR), up to a maximum of 250 components and/or gates. For generating minimal cut sets the method of bit manipu- lation is employed. In order to calculate each component's time dependent unavailability, a general and consistent set of mathematical models is developed and the repair time density function is allowed to be represented by constant, exponen- tial, 2nd order erlangian and log-normal distributions. A normally operating component is represented by a three-state model in order to be able to incorporate probabilities for revealed faults, non-revealed faults and false failures in unavailability calculations. For importance analysis, a routine is developed that will rearrange the fault tree to evaluate the importance of each component to system failure, given that a component and/or a sub-system is unavailable (ie. down or failed). The impor- tance of each component can be evaluated based on the instan- taneous or average unavailabilities of each components. To simulate the distribution of top event uncertainty, a Monte- Carlo sampling routine is used. This method allows the user to input uncertainties on the component's failure characteri- stics (ie. failure rate, average test time, average repair time, etc.) and assign different distributions for subsequent simulation. The code is benchmarked against WAMCUT, MODCUT, KITT, BIT-FRANTIC and PL-MODT. The results showed that UNRAC pro- duces results more consistent with the KITT results than either BIT-FRANTIC or PL-MODT. Overall it is demonstrated that UNRAC is an efficient and easy to use code and has the advantage of being able to do a complete fault tree analysis with this single code.en
dc.description.sponsorshipSponsored by Boston Edison Company under the MIT Energy Utility Program.en
dc.format.extent11009616 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherMIT Energy Laboratoryen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT-ELen
dc.relation.ispartofseries80-015en
dc.subjectReliability (Engineering) |x Computer programsen
dc.subjectReliability (Engineering) |x Mathematical modelsen
dc.subjectTrees (Graph theory)en
dc.titleQualitative and quantitative reliability analysis of safety systemsen
dc.typeTechnical Reporten


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record