Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJin Au Kong and Bae-Ian Wu.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYeung, Michael C. (Michael Chi-Hang)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-02-27T22:45:04Z
dc.date.available2008-02-27T22:45:04Z
dc.date.copyright2007en_US
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/40538
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2007.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 92-95).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study seeks to investigate various techniques used in Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) during the phase unwrapping process and the noise filtering step. In particular, as intuition would follow, we establish that the advantage of using three satellites over using just two in noise reduction means that using three satellites should be the way to go in all future work. In addition, this thesis does some in-depth investigation into the effectiveness of the following phase unwrapping methods: weighted least-squares phase unwrapping, branch-cut, and MAP dynamic programming phase unwrapping. The weighted least-squares unwrapping utilizes residues, which are points of inconsistencies on the interferogram, as a guide to assign weights when doing the weighting before the actual unwrapping step. Results show that weighted least square unwrapping fares the best in terms of mean RMS height error. We also introduce the notion of 2-D and 3-D Projection in our search for a simple, elegant solution to further reduce noise during our InSAR post-processing steps. 2-D Projection is shown to be a special case of 3-D Projection, and both require the presence of at least 3 satellites. Projection in general reduces noise in the system by utilizing the information provided by the configuration of the satellites to reduce the set of allowed phase points, thereby improving the robustness of the system to noise. Our results show that, for almost all cases, whether in the extremely small baseline distance or non-integer baseline ratios, using 3-D Projection gives much better results. Results are entirely simulation based, using the engineering tool MATLAB Version 7.0 developed by Mathworks. Root-mean-square errors will be used as the metric for comparison for most cases.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Michael C. Yeung.en_US
dc.format.extent95 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectElectrical Engineering and Computer Science.en_US
dc.titlePhase projection using three satellitesen_US
dc.title.alternativePhase projection using 3 satellitesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
dc.identifier.oclc192001895en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record