MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research
  • Working Papers
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research
  • Working Papers
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Prices vs. quantities with incomplete enforcement

Author(s)
Montero, Juan-Pablo
Thumbnail
Download99009.pdf (141.1Kb)
Other Contributors
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research.
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
This paper extends Weitzman's (1974) "Prices vs. Quantities" to allow for incomplete enforcement. Whether the regulator uses prices (e.g., taxes) or quantities (e.g., tradeable quotas), a first-best design is always inefficient in the presence of incomplete enforcement. A second-best design that incorporates incomplete enforcement, and where cost and benefit curves are known with certainty, can be implemented equally well with either instrument. If benefit and cost curves are uncertain, however, a quantity instrument performs better than a price instrument. In fact, if the slopes of the marginal cost and marginal benefit curves are equal, quantities are always preferred over prices. Results are consistent to alternative enforcement policies.
Date issued
1999
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/45094
Publisher
MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research
Other identifiers
99009
Series/Report no.
MIT-CEEPR (Series) ; 99-009WP.

Collections
  • Working Papers

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.