Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMontero, Juan-Pabloen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-04-03T17:08:35Z
dc.date.available2009-04-03T17:08:35Z
dc.date.issued1999en_US
dc.identifier99009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/45094
dc.description.abstractThis paper extends Weitzman's (1974) "Prices vs. Quantities" to allow for incomplete enforcement. Whether the regulator uses prices (e.g., taxes) or quantities (e.g., tradeable quotas), a first-best design is always inefficient in the presence of incomplete enforcement. A second-best design that incorporates incomplete enforcement, and where cost and benefit curves are known with certainty, can be implemented equally well with either instrument. If benefit and cost curves are uncertain, however, a quantity instrument performs better than a price instrument. In fact, if the slopes of the marginal cost and marginal benefit curves are equal, quantities are always preferred over prices. Results are consistent to alternative enforcement policies.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSupported by the MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research.en_US
dc.format.extent28 pen_US
dc.publisherMIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT-CEEPR (Series) ; 99-009WP.en_US
dc.titlePrices vs. quantities with incomplete enforcementen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.oclc52331281en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record