Estimation of Potential Aircraft Fuel Burn Reduction in Cruise Via Speed and Altitude Optimization Strategies
Name
Lovegren_ICAT-2011.pdf
Size
1.43 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
b7b8d974720f15757c2e18137f30ba2e
Author(s)
Lovegren, Jonathan
Hansman, R. John
Date Issued
April 13, 2011
Series/Report no.
ICAT;2011-3
Abstract
Environmental performance has become a dominant theme in all transportation sectors. As
scientific evidence for global climate change mounts, social and political pressure to reduce fuel
burn and CO2 emissions has increased accordingly, especially in the rapidly growing aviation
industry. Operational improvements offer the ability to increase the performance of any aircraft
immediately, by simply changing how the aircraft is flown. Cruise phase represents the largest
portion of flight, and correspondingly the largest opportunity for fuel burn reduction.
This research focuses on the potential efficiency benefits that can be achieved by improving
the cruise speed and altitude profiles operated by flights today. Speed and altitude are closely
linked with aircraft performance, so optimizing these profiles offers significant fuel burn
savings. Unlike lateral route optimization, which simply attempts to minimize the distance
flown, speed and altitude changes promise to increase the efficiency of aircraft throughout the
entire flight.
Flight data was collected for 257 flights during one day of domestic US operations. A process
was developed to calculate the cruise fuel burn of each selected flight, based on aircraft
performance data obtained from Piano-X and atmospheric data from NOAA. Improved speed
and altitude profiles were then generated for each flight, representing various levels of
optimization. Optimal cruise climbs and step climbs of 1,000 and 2,000 ft were analyzed, along
with optimal and LRC speed profiles.
Results showed that a maximum fuel burn reduction of 3.5% is possible in cruise given
complete altitude and speed optimization; this represents 2.6% fuel reduction system-wide,
corresponding to 300 billion gallons of jet fuel and 3.2 million tons of CO2 saved annually.
Flights showed a larger potential to improve speed performance, with nearly 2.4% savings
possible from speed optimization compared to 1.5% for altitude optimization. Few barriers exist
to some of the strategies such as step climbs and lower speeds, making them attractive in the
near term. As barriers are minimized, speed and altitude trajectory enhancements promise to
improve the environmental performance of the aviation industry with relative ease.
Subjects
air transportation
fuel burn
Enviornment
global climate change
CO2 emissions
cruise speed
Terms of Use
An error occurred on the license name.
Persistent DSpace Link
