MIT Libraries homeMIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL)
  • Artificial Intelligence Lab Publications
  • AI Memos (1959 - 2004)
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL)
  • Artificial Intelligence Lab Publications
  • AI Memos (1959 - 2004)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Type-alpha DPLs

Author(s)
Arkoudas, Konstantine
Thumbnail
DownloadAIM-2001-025.ps (1.684Mb)
Additional downloads
AIM-2001-025.pdf (796.3Kb)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
This paper introduces Denotational Proof Languages (DPLs). DPLs are languages for presenting, discovering, and checking formal proofs. In particular, in this paper we discus type-alpha DPLs---a simple class of DPLs for which termination is guaranteed and proof checking can be performed in time linear in the size of the proof. Type-alpha DPLs allow for lucid proof presentation and for efficient proof checking, but not for proof search. Type-omega DPLs allow for search as well as simple presentation and checking, but termination is no longer guaranteed and proof checking may diverge. We do not study type-omega DPLs here. We start by listing some common characteristics of DPLs. We then illustrate with a particularly simple example: a toy type-alpha DPL called PAR, for deducing parities. We present the abstract syntax of PAR, followed by two different kinds of formal semantics: evaluation and denotational. We then relate the two semantics and show how proof checking becomes tantamount to evaluation. We proceed to develop the proof theory of PAR, formulating and studying certain key notions such as observational equivalence that pervade all DPLs. We then present NDL, a type-alpha DPL for classical zero-order natural deduction. Our presentation of NDL mirrors that of PAR, showing how every basic concept that was introduced in PAR resurfaces in NDL. We present sample proofs of several well-known tautologies of propositional logic that demonstrate our thesis that DPL proofs are readable, writable, and concise. Next we contrast DPLs to typed logics based on the Curry-Howard isomorphism, and discuss the distinction between pure and augmented DPLs. Finally we consider the issue of implementing DPLs, presenting an implementation of PAR in SML and one in Athena, and end with some concluding remarks.
Date issued
2001-10-05
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/6661
Other identifiers
AIM-2001-025
Series/Report no.
AIM-2001-025
Keywords
AI, Deduction, formal proofs, semantics, proof checking, soundness, logic

Collections
  • AI Memos (1959 - 2004)

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries homeMIT Libraries logo

Find us on

Twitter Instagram YouTube

MIT Libraries navigation

SearchHours & locationsBorrow & requestResearch supportAbout us
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibility
MIT
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.