Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOdoni, Amedeo R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, R. W.en_US
dc.contributor.otherUnited States. Federal Aviation Administrationen_US
dc.contributor.otherUnited States. Dept. of Transportationen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Flight Transportation Laboratoryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-06T06:47:30Z
dc.date.available2012-01-06T06:47:30Z
dc.date.issued1979en_US
dc.identifier06451420en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/67941
dc.descriptionCover titleen_US
dc.descriptionOctober 1979en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. B1-B32)en_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract from Technical Report Documentation Page: This report is intended to serve as a guide to the availability and capability of state-of-the-art analytical and simulation models of the National Airspace System (NAS). An extensive literature search produced a listing of 230 reports potentially containing technical descriptions of models developed during the last decade. These reports are classified into primary categories based on applicability of the model to various aspects of the NAS. Capacity/delay models are classified as capacity-oriented runway, delay-oriented runway, complete airport, terminal airspace. air route traffic (including communications), controller workload and performance, and models of major segments of the NAS. Reports describing models primarily concerned with safety-related measures and noise-related measures are categorized separately. Reports were initially screened to eliminate those known to have been superseded by a subsequent report, and those containing inadequate or inconsequential technical information concerning models. The remaining reports (approximately 180) were subjected to a detailed review. The results of this review are documented for each of the 50 distinct models described by the selected reports. Information contained in each model review includes report ID, abstract, input/output parameters, computer-related characteristics, assumptions, quality of documentation, extent of validation, and an evaluation of the model's usefulness and limitations. Another part of the report contains a comparative evaluation of models in the same primary category. These evaluations present an overview of the models contained in each category, summarize the main features of the best models, and document the conclusions and recommendations regarding the models best suited for specific applications.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPrepared for U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Systems Engineering Managementen_US
dc.format.extentviii, 314, A1-A4, B1-B32, C1-C4 pen_US
dc.publisherCambridge, MA : Flight Transportation Laboratory, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology ; 1979en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFTL report (Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Flight Transportation Laboratory) ; R79-8en_US
dc.subjectAir traffic controlen_US
dc.subjectAirportsen_US
dc.subjectMathematical modelsen_US
dc.subjectTraffic controlen_US
dc.titleReview and evaluation of national airspace system modelsen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record