Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBartolomei, Jason E.
dc.contributor.authorHastings, Daniel E.
dc.contributor.authorde Neufville, Richard
dc.contributor.authorRhodes, Donna H.
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-23T18:19:06Z
dc.date.available2014-01-23T18:19:06Z
dc.date.issued2006-04-07
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84190
dc.description.abstractThe goal of this research is to develop an analytical framework for screening for real options “in” an engineering system. Real options is defined in the finance literature as the right, but not the obligation, to take an action (e.g. deferring, expanding, contracting, or abandoning) at a predetermined cost and for a predetermined time. These are called "real options" because they pertain to physical or tangible assets, such as equipment, rather than financial instruments. Real options improve a system’s capability of undergoing classes of changes with relative ease. This property is often called “flexibility.” Recently, the DoD has emphasized the need to develop flexible system in order to improve operational, technical, and programmatic effectiveness. The aim of this research is to apply real options thinking to weapon acquisitions in order to promote the ability of weapon system programs to deftly avoid downside consequences or exploit upside opportunities.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectengineering systemsen_US
dc.subjectreal optionsen_US
dc.subjectflexibilityen_US
dc.subjectdesign structure matrices (DSMs)en_US
dc.subjectengineering system matrix (ESM)en_US
dc.titleScreening for Real Options “In” an Engineering System: A Step Towards Flexible System Developmenten_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record