Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorChristoph F. Reinhart.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJakubiec, John Alstanen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-04T20:28:10Z
dc.date.available2014-11-04T20:28:10Z
dc.date.copyright2014en_US
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/91295
dc.descriptionThesis: Ph. D. in Architecture: Building Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architecture, 2014.en_US
dc.descriptionThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 137-144).en_US
dc.description.abstractIt is desirable to design buildings with natural daylight and views to the outside, which can maximize passive solar heating, minimize electric lighting use and contribute to feelings of wellbeing and awareness. Unfortunately, the presence of daylight is not always a positive one. Excessive brightness, strong contrast or intense reflections from daylight can cause visual discomfort or the inability to perform tasks. Typically, the total amount of luminous flux incident upon a surface per unit area - illuminance - present is used to predict visual discomfort due to questions about the benefit and validity of luminance-based analysis measures that are more related to the way the human visual system perceives light. This thesis aims to advance the understanding and usefulness of visual comfort prediction to the point that it can become commonly used in architectural design processes. One method through which this is achieved is by testing the ability of visual comfort analysis to resolve subjective occupant comfort. It was found that of existing discomfort glare metrics, daylight glare probability (DGP) was the most likely to perform well in a variety of daylight conditions and space types. Furthermore, a long-term simulation and survey study found that between 53.7% and 70.1% of an occupant's visual satisfaction could be resolved by analyzing DGP, the presence of direct sunlight and predicted monitor contrast ratio. This choice of metrics was reinforced by a separate laboratory study, which found that 74.4% of subjective comfort could be resolved and identified new subjective luminance thresholds that identify likely discomfort. A new adaptive visual comfort model, the 'adaptive zone,' is proposed in this thesis to deal with spatiality and view in visual discomfort analysis. Finally, ways of applying these verified and new measures in design processes are tackled in this work by producing new temporal maps, spatial discomfort analysis, and plan-based mappings of visual satisfaction.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby John Alstan Jakubiec.en_US
dc.format.extent144 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectArchitecture.en_US
dc.titleThe use of visual comfort metrics in the design of daylit spacesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh. D. in Architecture: Building Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture
dc.identifier.oclc893478277en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record