Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWarren P. Seering.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChu, Angela (Angela J.)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-05T19:35:26Z
dc.date.available2015-01-05T19:35:26Z
dc.date.copyright2014en_US
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/92604
dc.descriptionThesis: S.B., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2014.en_US
dc.descriptionThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (page 24).en_US
dc.description.abstractElectromechanical startups contend with signicant uncertainty, especially in early stages of development. Prototyping is a critical component through the product development process, and when employed eciently, can act as a method for mitigating risk associated with product viability for founders and funders. While extensive research has been conducted on prototyping practices in industry, there has been little investigation into prototyping for electromechanical startups. This research aims to understand current prototyping practices in these environments by answering the following questions. What kinds of prototypes do startups develop? What functions do these prototypes serve? What are the relevant traits that make these prototypes conducive to these functions? To develop a formal questionnaire, preliminary interviews with two startups were conducted. A case study was also conducted of prototyping practices in 2.009 Product Engineering Processes, an undergraduate course at MIT. Following this, secondary interviews were held with members of three additional startups. From a sample of 52 identied prototypes, relationships were found between the material categorizations of prototypes and three key functional roles: test, clarify, and communicate. To further understand the prototyping choices of startups, material categorizations were evaluated with respect to eight core prototype characteristics. Results show that prototypes favored for testing were physically interactive, such as 3D sketches or digitally fabricated models. Inexpensive and easy-to-alter representations (2D sketches, 3D sketches, and CAD) were created to clarify concepts. Visually appealing models (CAD, 2D sketches) were used heavily for both internal and external communication.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Angela Chu.en_US
dc.format.extent28 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectMechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.titlePrototyping practices in electromechanical startupsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.B.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc898188654en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record