Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorKord Smith and Benoit Forget.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGunow, Geoffrey Alexanderen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-31T19:08:34Z
dc.date.available2015-07-31T19:08:34Z
dc.date.copyright2015en_US
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/97963
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2015.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 89-90).en_US
dc.description.abstractExperimental quantification of PWR fuel reactivity burnup decrement biases and uncertainties using in-core flux map data from operating power reactors has previously been conducted employing analytical methods to systematically determine experimental fuel reactivities that best match measured fission rate distributions. This optimal core reactivity distribution that best matches the measured fission rate distribution is assumed to be associated with the true fuel reactivity distribution. Some parties have questioned whether fortuitous cancellation of errors between various approximations inherent in the 3D nodal diffusion core analysis models might have caused reactivity decrement biases and uncertainties to be unrealistically small. In this study, the BEAVRS benchmark is modeled with both 2D, full-core, multi-group transport calculations and 2D and 3D nodal diffusion calculations. The calculated reaction rates are compared with measured in-core detector reaction rates supplied in the benchmark. These models are used in conjunction with analytical methods to obtain fuel reactivity biases and uncertainties. Results demonstrate that fuel batch reactivities inferred from flux map data using full-core transport calculations are nearly identical to those inferred using nodal diffusion calculations. Consequently, nodal methods do not contribute significantly to reactivity decrement biases. Fuel reactivity biases and uncertainties inferred from 3D nodal diffusion calculations remain valid.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Geoffrey Alexander Gunow.en_US
dc.format.extent90 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectNuclear Science and Engineering.en_US
dc.titleLWR fuel reactivity depletion verification using 2D full core MOC and flux map dataen_US
dc.title.alternativeLight water reactor fuel reactivity depletion verification using two dimensional full core method of characteristics and flux map dataen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc913958896en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record