MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL)
  • CSAIL Digital Archive
  • CSAIL Technical Reports (July 1, 2003 - present)
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL)
  • CSAIL Digital Archive
  • CSAIL Technical Reports (July 1, 2003 - present)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Neural Voting Machines

Author(s)
Richards, Whitman; Seung, H. Sebastian
Thumbnail
DownloadMIT-CSAIL-TR-2004-083.ps (13393Kb)
Additional downloads
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
“Winner-take-all” networks typically pick as winners that alternative with the largest excitatory input. This choice is far from optimal when there is uncertainty in the strength of the inputs, and when information is available about how alternatives may be related. In the Social Choice community, many other procedures will yield more robust winners. The Borda Count and the pair-wise Condorcet tally are among the most favored. Their implementations are simple modifications of classical recurrent networks.
Date issued
2004-12-31
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/30513
Other identifiers
MIT-CSAIL-TR-2004-083
AIM-2004-029
Series/Report no.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Keywords
AI, WTA, Borda machine, Condorcet procedure, neural network

Collections
  • CSAIL Technical Reports (July 1, 2003 - present)

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.