Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPindyck, Robert S.
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-07T18:18:06Z
dc.date.available2011-09-07T18:18:06Z
dc.date.issued2009-02-13
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/65620
dc.description.abstractIn merger analysis and other antitrust settings, risk is often cited as a potential barrier to entry. But there is little consensus as to the kinds of risk that matter— systematic versus non-systematic and industry-wide versus firm-specific — and the mechanisms through which they affect entry. I show how and to what extent different kinds of risk magnify the deterrent effect of exogenous sunk costs of entry, and thereby affect industry dynamics, concentration, and equilibrium market prices. To do this, I develop a measure of the “full,” i.e., risk-adjusted, sunk cost of entry. I show that for reasonable parameter values, the full sunk cost is far larger than the direct measure of sunk cost typically used to analyze markets.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCambridge, MA; Alfred P. Sloan School of Mangement, Massachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT Sloan School Working Paper;4723-09
dc.subjectEntry barriersen_US
dc.subjectsunk costsen_US
dc.subjectinvestment decisionsen_US
dc.subjectrisken_US
dc.subjectmarket poweren_US
dc.subjectantitrusten_US
dc.titleSunk Costs and Risk-Based Barriers to Entryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record