MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL)
  • CSAIL Digital Archive
  • CSAIL Technical Reports (July 1, 2003 - present)
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL)
  • CSAIL Digital Archive
  • CSAIL Technical Reports (July 1, 2003 - present)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Refactoring for parameterizing Java classes

Author(s)
Kiezun, Adam; Ernst, Michael D.; Tip, Frank; Fuhrer, Robert M.
Thumbnail
DownloadMIT-CSAIL-TR-2006-061.pdf (262.2Kb)
Additional downloads
Other Contributors
Program Analysis
Advisor
Michael Ernst
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Type safety and expressiveness of many existing Java libraries and theirclient applications would improve, if the libraries were upgraded to definegeneric classes. Efficient and accurate tools exist to assist clientapplications to use generics libraries, but so far the libraries themselvesmust be parameterized manually, which is a tedious, time-consuming, anderror-prone task. We present a type-constraint-based algorithm forconverting non-generic libraries to add type parameters. The algorithmhandles the full Java language and preserves backward compatibility, thusmaking it safe for existing clients. Among other features, it is capableof inferring wildcard types and introducing type parameters formutually-dependent classes. We have implemented the algorithm as a fullyautomatic refactoring in Eclipse.We evaluated our work in two ways. First, our tool parameterized code thatwas lacking type parameters. We contacted the developers of several ofthese applications, and in all cases where we received a response, theyconfirmed that the resulting parameterizations were correct and useful.Second, to better quantify its effectiveness, our tool parameterizedclasses from already-generic libraries, and we compared the results tothose that were created by the libraries' authors. Our tool performed therefactoring accurately -- in 87% of cases the results were as good as thosecreated manually by a human expert, in 9% of cases the tool results werebetter, and in 4% of cases the tool results were worse.
Date issued
2006-09-05
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/33965
Other identifiers
MIT-CSAIL-TR-2006-061
Series/Report no.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory

Collections
  • CSAIL Technical Reports (July 1, 2003 - present)

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.