Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSilvio Micali
dc.contributor.authorMicali, Silvioen_US
dc.contributor.authorValiant, Paulen_US
dc.contributor.otherTheory of Computationen_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-11-14T05:00:26Z
dc.date.available2008-11-14T05:00:26Z
dc.date.issued2008-11-13
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/43709
dc.description.abstractDominant-strategy truthfulness is traditionally considered the best possible solution concept in mechanism design, as it enables one to predict with confidence which strategies INDEPENDENT players will actually choose. Yet, as with any other form of equilibrium, it too can be extremely vulnerable to COLLUSION. The problem of collusion is particularly evident for UNRESTRICTED combinatorial auctions}, arguably the hardest type of auctions.We thus investigate how much revenue can be guaranteed, in unrestricted combinatorial auctions, by dominant-strategy-truthful mechanisms that are COLLUSION-RESILIENT in a very strong sense; and obtain almost matching upper- and lower-bounds.en_US
dc.format.extent18 p.en_US
dc.relationMIT-CSAIL-TR-2008-039
dc.relationMIT-CSAIL-TR-2007-052
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT-CSAIL-TR-2008-067
dc.subjectResilient mechanism designen_US
dc.titleResilient Mechanisms For Truly Combinatorial Auctionsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record