Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWinston, Patrick H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBinford, Thomas O.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKatz, Borisen_US
dc.contributor.authorLowry, Michaelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2004-10-01T20:18:51Z
dc.date.available2004-10-01T20:18:51Z
dc.date.issued1982-11-01en_US
dc.identifier.otherAIM-679en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/5669
dc.description.abstractIt is too hard to tell vision systems what things look like. It is easier to talk about purpose and what things are for. Consequently, we want vision systems to use functional descriptions to identify things when necessary, and we want them to learn physical descriptions for themselves, when possible. This paper describes a theory that explains how to make such systems work. The theory is a synthesis of two sets of ideas: ideas about learning from precedents and exercises developed at MIT and ideas about physical description developed at Stanford. The strength of the synthesis is illustrated by way of representative experiments. All of these experiments have been performed with an implemented system.en_US
dc.format.extent23 p.en_US
dc.format.extent6843086 bytes
dc.format.extent946661 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/postscript
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAIM-679en_US
dc.subjectlearningen_US
dc.subjectform and functionen_US
dc.titleLearning Physical Descriptions from Functional Definitions, Examples, and Precedentsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record