MIT Libraries homeMIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL)
  • CSAIL Digital Archive
  • CSAIL Technical Reports (July 1, 2003 - present)
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL)
  • CSAIL Digital Archive
  • CSAIL Technical Reports (July 1, 2003 - present)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Asynchronous Failure Detectors

Author(s)
Cornejo, Alejandro; Lynch, Nancy; Sastry, Srikanth
Thumbnail
DownloadMIT-CSAIL-TR-2013-002.pdf (594.4Kb)
Other Contributors
Theory of Computation
Advisor
Nancy Lynch
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Failure detectors -- oracles that provide information about process crashes -- are an important abstraction for crash tolerance in distributed systems. The generality of failure-detector theory, while providing great expressiveness, poses significant challenges in developing a robust hierarchy of failure detectors. We address some of these challenges by proposing (1) a variant of failure detectors called asynchronous failure detectors and (2) an associated modeling framework. Unlike the traditional failure-detector framework, our framework eschews real-time completely. We show that asynchronous failure detectors are sufficiently expressive to include several popular failure detectors including, but not limited to, the canonical Chandra-Toueg failure detectors, Sigma and other quorum failure detectors, Omega, anti-Omega, Omega^k, and Psi_k. Additionally, asynchronous failure detectors satisfy many desirable properties: they are self-implementable, guarantee that stronger asynchronous failure-detectors solve harder problems, and ensure that their outputs encode no information other than the set of crashed processes. We introduce the notion of a failure detector being representative for a problem to capture the idea that some problems encode the same information about process crashes as their weakest failure detectors do. We show that a large class of problems, called bounded problems, do not have representative failure detectors. Finally, we use the asynchronous failure-detector framework to show how sufficiently strong AFDs circumvent the impossibility of consensus in asynchronous systems.
Description
This report is superseded by MIT-CSAIL-TR-2013-025.
Date issued
2013-01-30
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/76716
Series/Report no.
MIT-CSAIL-TR-2013-002
Keywords
Asynchronous System, Fault-Tolerance, I/O Automata

Collections
  • CSAIL Technical Reports (July 1, 2003 - present)
  • Technical Reports and Memos

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries homeMIT Libraries logo

Find us on

Twitter Instagram YouTube

MIT Libraries navigation

SearchHours & locationsBorrow & requestResearch supportAbout us
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibility
MIT
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.