The MIT Libraries is completing a major upgrade to DSpace@MIT.
Starting May 5 2026, DSpace will remain functional, viewable, searchable, and downloadable, however, you will not be able to edit existing collections or add new material.
We are aiming to have full functionality restored by May 18, 2026, but intermittent service interruptions may occur.
Please email dspace-lib@mit.edu with any questions.
Thank you for your patience as we implement this important upgrade.
Code for Java Libraries for Accessing the Princeton Wordnet: Comparison and Evaluation
| dc.contributor.advisor | Patrick Winston | |
| dc.contributor.author | Finlayson, Mark Alan | en_US |
| dc.contributor.other | Genesis | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-11-01T17:18:16Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-11-01T17:18:16Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013-11-01 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81949 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This archive contains the code and data for running the evaluations described in: Finlayson, Mark Alan (2014) "Java Libraries for Accessing the Princeton Wordnet: comparison and Evaluation" in Proceedings of the 7th Global Wordnet Conference (GWC 2014). Tartu, Estonia, 25-29 January 2014. The archive contains five Eclipse projects (compatible with Eclipse 3.8.0) that may be imported directly into an Eclipse workspace. You will need a Java 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6 JRE to run all the code in the archive. Paper abstract: Java is a popular programming language for natural language processing. I compare and evaluate 12 Java libraries designed to access the information in the original Princeton Wordnet databases. From this comparison emerges a set of decision criteria that will enable a user to pick the library most suited to their purposes. I identify five deciding features: (1) availability of similarity metrics; (2) support for editing; (3) availability via Maven; (4) compatibility with retired Java versions; and (5) support for Enterprise Java. I also provide a comparison of other features of each library, the information exposed by each API, and the versions of Wordnet each library supports, and I evaluate each library for the speed of various retrieval operations. In the case that the user's application does not require one of the deciding features, I show that my library, JWI, the MIT Java Wordnet Interface, is the highest-performance, widest-coverage, easiest-to-use library available. | en_US |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ | en_US |
| dc.title | Code for Java Libraries for Accessing the Princeton Wordnet: Comparison and Evaluation | en_US |
| dc.date.updated | 2013-11-01T17:18:17Z |