Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHo, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorSull, Alan C.
dc.contributor.authorVuong, Laurel N.
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yueli
dc.contributor.authorFujimoto, James G.
dc.contributor.authorSchuman, Joel S.
dc.contributor.authorDuker, Jay S.
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Jonathan Jaoshin
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-15T02:01:39Z
dc.date.available2015-12-15T02:01:39Z
dc.date.issued2009-07
dc.date.submitted2009-03
dc.identifier.issn01616420
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/100256
dc.description.abstractPurpose To report the frequency of optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan artifacts and to compare macular thickness measurements, interscan reproducibility, and interdevice agreeability across 3 spectral-domain (SD) OCT (also known as Fourier domain; Cirrus HD-OCT, RTVue-100, and Topcon 3D-OCT 1000) devices and 1 time-domain (TD) OCT (Stratus OCT) device. Design Prospective, noncomparative, noninterventional case series. Participants Fifty-two patients seen at the New England Eye Center, Tufts Medical Center Retina Service, between February and August 2008. Methods Two scans were performed for each of the SD OCT protocols: Cirrus macular cube 512×128 (software version 3.0; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA), RTVue (E)MM5 and MM6 (software version 3.5; Optovue, Inc., Fremont, CA), Topcon 3D Macular and Radial (software version 2.12; Topcon, Inc., Paramus, NJ), in addition to 1 TD OCT scan via Stratus macular thickness protocol (software version 4.0; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.). Scans were inspected for 6 types of OCT scan artifacts and were analyzed. Interscan reproducibility and interdevice agreeability were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots, respectively. Main Outcome Measures Optical coherence tomography image artifacts, macular thickness, reproducibility, and agreeability. Results Time-domain OCT scans contained a significantly higher percentage of clinically significant improper central foveal thickness (IFT) after manual correction (11-μm change or more) compared with SD OCT scans. Cirrus HD-OCT had a significantly lower percentage of clinically significant IFT (11.1%) compared with the other SD OCT devices (Topcon 3D, 20.4%; Topcon Radial, 29.6%; RTVue (E)MM5, 42.6%; RTVue MM6, 24.1%; P = 0.001). All 3 SD OCT devices had central foveal subfield thicknesses that were significantly more than that of TD OCT after manual correction (P<0.0001). All 3 SD OCT devices demonstrated a high degree of reproducibility in the central foveal region (ICCs, 0.92–0.97). Bland-Altman plots showed low agreeability between TD and SD OCT scans. Conclusions Out of all OCT devices analyzed, cirrus HD-OCT scans exhibited the lowest occurrence of any artifacts (68.5%), IFT (40.7%), and clinically significant IFT (11.1%), whereas Stratus OCT scans exhibited the highest occurrence of clinically significant IFT. Further work on improving segmentation algorithm to decrease artifacts is warranted.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipResearch to Prevent Blindness, Inc. (United States) (Challenge Grant)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant R01-EY11289-23)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant R01-EY13178-07)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant P30-EY008098)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (Grant FA9550-07-1-0101)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (Grant FA9550-07-1-0014)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.03.034en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceElsevieren_US
dc.titleAssessment of Artifacts and Reproducibility across Spectral- and Time-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Devicesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationHo, Joseph, Alan C. Sull, Laurel N. Vuong, Yueli Chen, Jonathan Liu, James G. Fujimoto, Joel S. Schuman, and Jay S. Duker. “Assessment of Artifacts and Reproducibility Across Spectral- and Time-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Devices.” Ophthalmology 116, no. 10 (October 2009): 1960–1970.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Research Laboratory of Electronicsen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorChen, Yuelien_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorLiu, Jonathan Jaoshinen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorFujimoto, James G.en_US
dc.relation.journalOphthalmologyen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsHo, Joseph; Sull, Alan C.; Vuong, Laurel N.; Chen, Yueli; Liu, Jonathan; Fujimoto, James G.; Schuman, Joel S.; Duker, Jay S.en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0828-4357
dspace.mitauthor.errortrue
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record