Voter Buying: Shaping the Electorate through Clientelism
Author(s)
Nichter, Simeon; Hidalgo, Fernando Daniel
DownloadVoter_Buying.pdf (5.209Mb)
OPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
Open Access Policy
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Studies of clientelism typically assume that political machines distribute rewards to persuade or mobilize the existing electorate. We argue that rewards not only influence actions of the electorate, but can also shape its composition. Across the world, machines employ “voter buying” to import outsiders into their districts. Voter buying demonstrates how clientelism can underpin electoral fraud, and it offers an explanation of why machines deliver rewards when they cannot monitor vote choices. Our analyses suggest that voter buying dramatically influences municipal elections in Brazil. A regression discontinuity design suggests that voter audits—which undermined voter buying—decreased the electorate by 12 percentage points and reduced the likelihood of mayoral reelection by 18 percentage points. Consistent with voter buying, these effects are significantly greater in municipalities with large voter inflows, and where neighboring municipalities had large voter outflows. Findings are robust to an alternative research design using a different data set.
Date issued
2015-08Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political ScienceJournal
American Journal of Political Science
Publisher
Wiley Blackwell
Citation
Hidalgo, F. Daniel, and Simeon Nichter. “Voter Buying: Shaping the Electorate through Clientelism.” American Journal of Political Science (August 6, 2015): n/a–n/a.
Version: Author's final manuscript
ISSN
00925853
1540-5907