Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMariani, José
dc.contributor.authorGuedes, Cristiano
dc.contributor.authorSoares, Paulo
dc.contributor.authorZalc, Silvio
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Carlos M.
dc.contributor.authorLopes, Augusto Celso de Araujo
dc.contributor.authorSpadaro, André G.
dc.contributor.authorPerin, Marco A.
dc.contributor.authorFilho, Antonio Esteves
dc.contributor.authorTakimura, Celso K.
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Expedito
dc.contributor.authorKalil-Filho, Roberto
dc.contributor.authorEdelman, Elazer R.
dc.contributor.authorSerruys, Patrick W.
dc.contributor.authorLemos, Pedro A.
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-06T16:29:32Z
dc.date.available2016-06-06T16:29:32Z
dc.date.issued2014-10
dc.date.submitted2014-04
dc.identifier.issn19368798
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102986
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance on the final volume of contrast agent used in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background: To date, few approaches have been described to reduce the final dose of contrast agent in PCIs. We hypothesized that IVUS might serve as an alternative imaging tool to angiography in many steps during PCI, thereby reducing the use of iodine contrast. Methods: A total of 83 patients were randomized to angiography-guided PCI or IVUS-guided PCI; both groups were treated according to a pre-defined meticulous procedural strategy. The primary endpoint was the total volume contrast agent used during PCI. Patients were followed clinically for an average of 4 months. Results: The median total volume of contrast was 64.5 ml (interquartile range [IQR]: 42.8 to 97.0 ml; minimum, 19 ml; maximum, 170 ml) in the angiography-guided group versus 20.0 ml (IQR: 12.5 to 30.0 ml; minimum, 3 ml; maximum, 54 ml) in the IVUS-guided group (p < 0.001). Similarly, the median volume of contrast/creatinine clearance ratio was significantly lower among patients treated with IVUS-guided PCI (1.0 [IQR: 0.6 to 1.9] vs. 0.4 [IQR: 0.2 to 0.6, respectively; p < 0.001). In-hospital and 4-month outcomes were not different between patients randomized to angiography-guided and IVUS-guided PCI. Conclusions: Thoughtful and extensive use of IVUS as the primary imaging tool to guide PCI is safe and markedly reduces the volume of iodine contrast compared with angiography-alone guidance. The use of IVUS should be considered for patients at high risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury or volume overload undergoing coronary angioplasty.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (NIH grant R01 GM49039)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Pesquisas (Brazil) (Grant)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC) (Arie Fellowship)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2014.05.024en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.titleIntravascular Ultrasound Guidance to Minimize the Use of Iodine Contrast in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The MOZART (Minimizing cOntrast utiliZation With IVUS Guidance in coRonary angioplasTy) Randomized Controlled Trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationMariani Jr., Jose, Cristiano Guedes, Paulo Soares, Silvio Zalc, Carlos M. Campos, Augusto C. Lopes, Andre G. Spadaro, Marco A. Perin, Anotonio Esteves Filho, Celso K. Takimura, Expedito Ribeiro, Roberto Kalil-Filho, Elazer R. Edelman, Patrick W. Serruys, and Pedro A. Lemos. "Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance to Minimize the Use of Iodine Contrast in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention : The MOZART (Minimizing cOntrast utiliZation With IVUS Guidance in coRonary angioplasTy) Randomized Controlled Trial." JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 7:11 (November 2014), pp. 1287-1293.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute for Medical Engineering and Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorLopes, Augusto Celso de Araujoen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorEdelman, Elazer R.en_US
dc.relation.journalJACC: Cardiovascular Interventionsen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsMariani, José; Guedes, Cristiano; Soares, Paulo; Zalc, Silvio; Campos, Carlos M.; Lopes, Augusto C.; Spadaro, André G.; Perin, Marco A.; Filho, Antonio Esteves; Takimura, Celso K.; Ribeiro, Expedito; Kalil-Filho, Roberto; Edelman, Elazer R.; Serruys, Patrick W.; Lemos, Pedro A.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7832-7156
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record