Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Thomas A.
dc.contributor.authorJones, Richard D.
dc.contributor.authorSnavely, Andrew R.
dc.contributor.authorPfenning, Andreas R.
dc.contributor.authorKirchner, Rory
dc.contributor.authorHemberg, Martin
dc.contributor.authorGray, Jesse M.
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-16T15:31:38Z
dc.date.available2017-02-16T15:31:38Z
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.date.submitted2016-01
dc.identifier.issn1088-9051
dc.identifier.issn1549-5469
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/106954
dc.description.abstractPromoters initiate RNA synthesis, and enhancers stimulate promoter activity. Whether promoter and enhancer activities are encoded distinctly in DNA sequences is unknown. We measured the enhancer and promoter activities of thousands of DNA fragments transduced into mouse neurons. We focused on genomic loci bound by the neuronal activity-regulated coactivator CREBBP, and we measured enhancer and promoter activities both before and after neuronal activation. We find that the same sequences typically encode both enhancer and promoter activities. However, gene promoters generate more promoter activity than distal enhancers, despite generating similar enhancer activity. Surprisingly, the greater promoter activity of gene promoters is not due to conventional core promoter elements or splicing signals. Instead, we find that particular transcription factor binding motifs are intrinsically biased toward the generation of promoter activity, whereas others are not. Although the specific biases we observe may be dependent on experimental or cellular context, our results suggest that gene promoters are distinguished from distal enhancers by specific complements of transcriptional activators.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute of Mental Health (U.S.) (Grant R01 MH101528-01)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherCold Spring Harbor Laboratory Pressen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.204834.116en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceCold Spring Harbor Laboratory Pressen_US
dc.titleHigh-throughput functional comparison of promoter and enhancer activitiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationNguyen, Thomas A. et al. “High-Throughput Functional Comparison of Promoter and Enhancer Activities.” Genome Research 26.8 (2016): 1023–1033.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratoryen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorPfenning, Andreas R.
dc.relation.journalGenome Researchen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsNguyen, Thomas A.; Jones, Richard D.; Snavely, Andrew R.; Pfenning, Andreas R.; Kirchner, Rory; Hemberg, Martin; Gray, Jesse M.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3447-9801
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record