Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAllen, Heidi L.
dc.contributor.authorWright, Bill J.
dc.contributor.authorBaicker, Katherine
dc.contributor.authorTaubman, Sarah L.
dc.contributor.authorFinkelstein, Amy
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-09T20:48:32Z
dc.date.available2018-03-09T20:48:32Z
dc.date.issued2016-10
dc.identifier.issn0028-4793
dc.identifier.issn1533-4406
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/114043
dc.description.abstractThe effect of Medicaid coverage on health and the use of health care services is of first-order policy importance, particularly as policymakers consider expansions of public health insurance. Estimating the effects of expanding Medicaid is challenging, however, because Medicaid enrollees and the uninsured differ in many ways that may also affect outcomes of interest. Oregon’s 2008 expansion of Medicaid through random-lottery selection of potential enrollees from a waiting list offers the opportunity to assess Medicaid’s effects with a randomized evaluation that is not contaminated by such confounding factors. In a previous examination of the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment, we found that Medicaid coverage increased health care use across a range of settings, improved financial security, and reduced rates of depression among enrollees, but it produced no detectable changes in several measures of physical health, employment rates, or earnings.en_US
dc.publisherNew England Journal of Medicine (NEJM/MMS)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMP1609533en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceThe New England Journal of Medicineen_US
dc.titleEffect of Medicaid Coverage on ED Use — Further Evidence from Oregon’s Experimenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationFinkelstein, Amy N., Sarah L. Taubman, Heidi L. Allen, Bill J. Wright, and Katherine Baicker. “Effect of Medicaid Coverage on ED Use — Further Evidence from Oregon’s Experiment.” New England Journal of Medicine 375, no. 16 (October 20, 2016): 1505–1507. © 2016 Massachusetts Medical Societyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economicsen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorFinkelstein, Amy
dc.relation.journalNew England Journal of Medicineen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-02-21T18:42:11Z
dspace.orderedauthorsFinkelstein, Amy N.; Taubman, Sarah L.; Allen, Heidi L.; Wright, Bill J.; Baicker, Katherineen_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9941-6684
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record