Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIvy, Diane J
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-12T17:27:03Z
dc.date.available2018-06-12T17:27:03Z
dc.date.issued2018-01
dc.date.submitted2017-01
dc.identifier.issn1680-7375
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/116270
dc.description.abstractBased on observations of the chlorofluorocarbons CFC-13 (chlorotrifluoromethane), 6CFC-114 (combined measurement of both isomers of dichlorotetrafluoroethane), and CFC-115 (chloropentafluoroethane) in atmospheric and firn samples, we reconstruct records of their tropospheric histories spanning nearly 8 decades. These compounds were measured in polar firn air samples, in ambient air archived in canisters, and in situ at the AGAGE (Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment) network and affiliated sites. Global emissions to the atmosphere are derived from these observations using an inversion based on a 12-box atmospheric transport model. For CFC-13, we provide the first comprehensive global analysis. This compound increased monotonically from its first appearance in the atmosphere in the late 1950s to a mean global abundance of 3.18 ppt (dry-air mole fraction in parts per trillion, pmolmol[superscript −1]) in 2016. Its growth rate has decreased since the mid-1980s but has remained at a surprisingly high mean level of 0.02 ppt yr[superscript −1] since 2000, resulting in a continuing growth of CFC-13 in the atmosphere. 6CFC-114 increased from its appearance in the 1950s to a maximum of 16.6 ppt in the early 2000s and has since slightly declined to 16.3 ppt in 2016. CFC-115 increased monotonically from its first appearance in the 1960s and reached a global mean mole fraction of 8.49 ppt in 2016. Growth rates of all three compounds over the past years are significantly larger than would be expected from zero emissions. Under the assumption of unchanging lifetimes and atmospheric transport patterns, we derive global emissions from our measurements, which have remained unexpectedly high in recent years: mean yearly emissions for the last decade (2007–2016) of CFC-13 are at 0.48 ± 0.15 kt yr[superscript −1] (> 15 % of past peak emissions), of 6CFC-114 at 1.90 ± 0.84 kt yr[superscript −1] (∼ 10 % of peak emissions), and of CFC-115 at 0.80±0.50 kt yr[superscript −1] (> 5 % of peak emissions). Mean yearly emissions of CFC-115 for 2015–2016 are 1.14 ± 0.50 kt yr[superscript −1] and have doubled compared to the 2007–2010 minimum. We find CFC-13 emissions from aluminum smelters but if extrapolated to global emissions, they cannot account for the lingering global emissions determined from the atmospheric observations. We find impurities of CFC-115 in the refrigerant HFC-125 (CHF2CF3) but if extrapolated to global emissions, they can neither account for the lingering global CFC-115 emissions determined from the atmospheric observations nor for their recent increases. We also conduct regional inversions for the years 2012–2016 for the northeastern Asian area using observations from the Korean AGAGE site at Gosan and find significant emissions for 6CFC-114 and CFC-115, suggesting that a large fraction of their global emissions currently occur in northeastern Asia and more specifically on the Chinese mainland.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (U.S.). Division of Polar Programsen_US
dc.publisherCopernicus GmbHen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5194/ACP-2017-935en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceCopernicus Publicationsen_US
dc.titleAtmospheric Histories and Emissions of Chlorofluorocarbons CFC-13(CClF[subscript 3]), ΣCFC-114 (C[subscript 2]Cl[subscript 2]F[subscript 4]), and CFC-115 (C[subscript 2]ClF[subscript 5]en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationVollmer, Martin K., et al. “Atmospheric Histories and Emissions of Chlorofluorocarbons CFC-13(CClF[subscript 3]), ΣCFC-114 (C[subscript 2]Cl{subscript 2]F[subscript 4}), and CFC-115 (C[subscript 2]ClF[subscript 5]” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, Oct. 2017, pp. 1–39. Crossref, doi:10.5194/acp-2017-935. © 2018 Authorsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Global Change Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorIvy, Diane J
dc.relation.journalAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussionsen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2018-05-04T18:27:58Z
dspace.orderedauthorsVollmer, Martin K.; Young, Dickon; Trudinger, Cathy M.; Mühle, Jens; Henne, Stephan; Rigby, Matthew; Park, Sunyoung; Li, Shanlan; Guillevic, Myriam; Mitrevski, Blagoj; Harth, Christina M.; Miller, Benjamin R.; Reimann, Stefan; Yao, Bo; Steele, L. Paul; Wyss, Simon A.; Lunder, Chris R.; Arduini, Jgor; McCulloch, Archie; Wu, Songhao; Rhee, Tae Siek; Wang, Ray H. J.; Salameh, Peter K.; Hermansen, Ove; Hill, Matthias; Langenfelds, Ray L.; Ivy, Diane; O'Doherty, Simon; Krummel, Paul B.; Maione, Michela; Etheridge, David M.; Zhou, Lingxi; Fraser, Paul J.; Prinn, Ronald G.; Weiss, Ray F.; Simmonds, Peter G.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record