Can the Biomedical Research Cycle be a Model for Political Science?
Author(s)
Lieberman, Evan S
DownloadCan the biomedical research.pdf (1.269Mb)
OPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
Open Access Policy
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In sciences such as biomedicine, researchers and journal editors are well aware that progress in answering difficult questions generally requires movement through a research cycle: Research on a topic or problem progresses from pure description, through correlational analyses and natural experiments, to phased randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In biomedical research all of these research activities are valued and find publication outlets in major journals. In political science, however, a growing emphasis on valid causal inference has led to the suppression of work early in the research cycle. The result of a potentially myopic emphasis on just one aspect of the cycle reduces incentives for discovery of new types of political phenomena, and more careful, efficient, transparent, and ethical research practices. Political science should recognize the significance of the research cycle and develop distinct criteria to evaluate work at each of its stages.
Date issued
2016-12Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political ScienceJournal
Perspectives on Politics
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Citation
Lieberman, Evan S. “Can the Biomedical Research Cycle Be a Model for Political Science?” Perspectives on Politics 14, 4 (December 2016): 1054–1066 © 2016 American Political Science Association
Version: Author's final manuscript
ISSN
1537-5927
1541-0986