Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNimmo, F.
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, D. P.
dc.contributor.authorMcKinnon, W. B.
dc.contributor.authorSchenk, P. M.
dc.contributor.authorBierson, C. J.
dc.contributor.authorBeyer, R. A.
dc.contributor.authorMoore, J. M.
dc.contributor.authorStern, S. A.
dc.contributor.authorWeaver, H. A.
dc.contributor.authorOlkin, C. B.
dc.contributor.authorYoung, L. A.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, K. E.
dc.contributor.authorNew Horizons Geology, Geophysics and Imaging Theme Team
dc.contributor.authorBinzel, Richard P
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-20T14:22:56Z
dc.date.available2020-05-20T14:22:56Z
dc.date.issued2016-11
dc.date.submitted2016-05
dc.identifier.issn0028-0836
dc.identifier.issn1476-4687
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/125341
dc.description.abstractThe deep nitrogen-covered basin on Pluto, informally named Sputnik Planitia, is located very close to the longitude of Pluto's tidal axis and may be an impact feature, by analogy with other large basins in the Solar System. Reorientation of Sputnik Planitia arising from tidal and rotational torques can explain the basin's present-day location, but requires the feature to be a positive gravity anomaly, despite its negative topography. Here we argue that if Sputnik Planitia did indeed form as a result of an impact and if Pluto possesses a subsurface ocean, the required positive gravity anomaly would naturally result because of shell thinning and ocean uplift, followed by later modest nitrogen deposition. Without a subsurface ocean, a positive gravity anomaly requires an implausibly thick nitrogen layer (exceeding 40 kilometres). To prolong the lifetime of such a subsurface ocean to the present day and to maintain ocean uplift, a rigid, conductive water-ice shell is required. Because nitrogen deposition is latitude-dependent, nitrogen loading and reorientation may have exhibited complex feedbacks.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature20148en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourcearXiven_US
dc.titleReorientation of Sputnik Planitia implies a subsurface ocean on Plutoen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationNimmo, F. et al. "Reorientation of Sputnik Planitia implies a subsurface ocean on Pluto." Nature 540, 7631 (November 2016): 94-96 © 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Natureen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.journalNatureen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2020-03-19T16:26:17Z
dspace.date.submission2020-03-19T16:26:24Z
mit.journal.volume540en_US
mit.journal.issue7631en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record