Challenging the workhorse: Comparative analysis of eukaryotic micro‐organisms for expressing monoclonal antibodies
Author(s)
Jiang, Hanxiao; Horwitz, Andrew A; Wright, Chapman; Tai, Anna; Znameroski, Elizabeth A; Tsegaye, Yoseph; Warbington, Hailley; Bower, Benjamin S; Alves, Christina; Co, Carl; Jonnalagadda, Kanvasri; Platt, Darren; Walter, Jessica M; Natarajan, Venkatesh; Ubersax, Jeffrey A; Cherry, Joel R; Love, J Christopher; ... Show more Show less![Thumbnail](/bitstream/handle/1721.1/134784/Jiang_et_al-2019-Biotechnology_and_Bioengineering.pdf.jpg?sequence=4&isAllowed=y)
DownloadPublished version (884.0Kb)
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
© 2019 The Authors. Biotechnology and Bioengineering Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. For commercial protein therapeutics, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells have an established history of safety, proven capability to express a wide range of therapeutic proteins and high volumetric productivities. Expanding global markets for therapeutic proteins and increasing concerns for broadened access of these medicines has catalyzed consideration of alternative approaches to this platform. Reaching these objectives likely will require an order of magnitude increase in volumetric productivity and a corresponding reduction in the costs of manufacture. For CHO-based manufacturing, achieving this combination of targeted improvements presents challenges. Based on a holistic analysis, the choice of host cells was identified as the single most influential factor for both increasing productivity and decreasing costs. Here we evaluated eight wild-type eukaryotic micro-organisms with prior histories of recombinant protein expression. The evaluation focused on assessing the potential of each host, and their corresponding phyla, with respect to key attributes relevant for manufacturing, namely (a) growth rates in industry-relevant media, (b) adaptability to modern techniques for genome editing, and (c) initial characterization of product quality. These characterizations showed that multiple organisms may be suitable for production with appropriate engineering and development and highlighted that yeast in general present advantages for rapid genome engineering and development cycles.
Date issued
2019Department
Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MITJournal
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Publisher
Wiley