Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNorville, Julie E.
dc.contributor.authorDerda, Ratmir
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Saurabh
dc.contributor.authorDrinkwater, Kelly A.
dc.contributor.authorBelcher, Angela M.
dc.contributor.authorLeschziner, Andres E.
dc.contributor.authorKnight, Thomas F., Jr.
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-16T14:38:25Z
dc.date.available2011-05-16T14:38:25Z
dc.date.issued2010-12
dc.date.submitted2010-06
dc.identifier.issn1754-1611
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/62825
dc.description.abstractBackground: BioBrick standard biological parts are designed to make biological systems easier to engineer (e.g. assemble, manipulate, and modify). There are over 5,000 parts available in the Registry of Standard Biological Parts that can be easily assembled into genetic circuits using a standard assembly technique. The standardization of the assembly technique has allowed for wide distribution to a large number of users -- the parts are reusable and interchangeable during the assembly process. The standard assembly process, however, has some limitations. In particular it does not allow for modification of already assembled biological circuits, addition of protein tags to pre-existing BioBrick parts, or addition of non-BioBrick parts to assemblies. Results: In this paper we describe a simple technique for rapid generation of synthetic biological circuits using introduction of customized inserts. We demonstrate its use in Escherichia coli (E. coli) to express green fluorescent protein (GFP) at pre-calculated relative levels and to add an N-terminal tag to GFP. The technique uses a new BioBrick part (called a BioScaffold) that can be inserted into cloning vectors and excised from them to leave a gap into which other DNA elements can be placed. The removal of the BioScaffold is performed by a Type IIB restriction enzyme (REase) that recognizes the BioScaffold but cuts into the surrounding sequences; therefore, the placement and removal of the BioScaffold allows the creation of seamless connections between arbitrary DNA sequences in cloning vectors. The BioScaffold contains a built-in red fluorescent protein (RFP) reporter; successful insertion of the BioScaffold is, thus, accompanied by gain of red fluorescence and its removal is manifested by disappearance of the red fluorescence. Conclusions: The ability to perform targeted modifications of existing BioBrick circuits with BioScaffolds (1) simplifies and speeds up the iterative design-build-test process through direct reuse of existing circuits, (2) allows incorporation of sequences incompatible with BioBrick assembly into BioBrick circuits (3) removes scar sequences between standard biological parts, and (4) provides a route to adapt synthetic biology innovations to BioBrick assembly through the creation of new parts rather than new assembly standards or parts collections.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Academy of Sciences (U.S.). National Academies Keck Futures Initiative (NAKFI) (Grant SB3)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipKAUST Scholar Graduate Research Fellowshipen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSynthetic Biology Engineering Research Center (SynBERC) NSF ERCen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAlfred P. Sloan Foundationen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWyss Institute of Biologically Inspired Engineeringen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Army Research Office. Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologiesen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Army Research Office. Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologiesen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltden_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-4-17en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.sourceBioMed Central Ltden_US
dc.titleIntroduction of customized inserts for streamlined assembly and optimization of BioBrick synthetic genetic circuitsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Biological Engineering. 2010 Dec 20;4(1):17en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratoryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biological Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorNorville, Julie E.
dc.contributor.mitauthorGupta, Saurabh
dc.contributor.mitauthorDrinkwater, Kelly A.
dc.contributor.mitauthorBelcher, Angela M.
dc.contributor.mitauthorKnight, Thomas F., Jr.
dc.relation.journalJournal of Biological Engineeringen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.pmid21172029
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2011-05-09T18:32:58Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderNorville et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dspace.orderedauthorsNorville, Julie E; Derda, Ratmir; Gupta, Saurabh; Drinkwater, Kelly A; Belcher, Angela M; Leschziner, Andres E; Knight, Thomas Fen
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9773-4593
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9353-7453
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record