Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMohammad, Duaa H.
dc.contributor.authorYaffe, Michael B
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-19T18:06:35Z
dc.date.available2012-11-19T18:06:35Z
dc.date.issued2009-05
dc.identifier.issn1568-7864
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/74679
dc.description.abstractThe DNA damage response depends on the concerted activity of protein serine/threonine kinases and modular phosphoserine/threonine-binding domains to relay the damage signal and recruit repair proteins. The PIKK family of protein kinases, which includes ATM/ATR/DNA-PK, preferentially phosphorylate Ser-Gln sites, while their basophilic downstream effecter kinases, Chk1/Chk2/MK2 preferentially phosphorylate hydrophobic-X-Arg-X-X-Ser/Thr-hydrophobic sites. A subset of tandem BRCT domains act as phosphopeptide binding modules that bind to ATM/ATR/DNA-PK substrates after DNA damage. Conversely, 14-3-3 proteins interact with substrates of Chk1/Chk2/MK2. FHA domains have been shown to interact with substrates of ATM/ATR/DNA-PK and CK2. In this review we consider how substrate phsophorylation together with BRCT domains, FHA domains and 14-3-3 proteins function to regulate ionizing radiation-induced nuclear foci and help to establish the G2/M checkpoint. We discuss the role of MDC1 a molecular scaffold that recruits early proteins to foci, such as NBS1 and RNF8, through distinct phosphodependent interactions. In addition, we consider the role of 14-3-3 proteins and the Chk2 FHA domain in initiating and maintaining cell cycle arrest.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.004en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/en_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.title14-3-3 Proteins, FHA Domains and BRCT Domains in the DNA Damage Responseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationMohammad, Duaa H., and Michael B. Yaffe. “14-3-3 Proteins, FHA Domains and BRCT Domains in the DNA Damage Response.” DNA Repair 8.9 (2009): 1009–1017.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biological Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MITen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorMohammad, Duaa H.
dc.contributor.mitauthorYaffe, Michael B.
dc.relation.journalDNA Repairen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsMohammad, Duaa H.; Yaffe, Michael B.en
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9547-3251
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record