Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLee, Chaiwoo
dc.contributor.authorGrogan, Paul Thomas
dc.contributor.authorde Weck, Olivier L.
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-17T14:11:39Z
dc.date.available2014-01-17T14:11:39Z
dc.date.issued2012-10
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-4673-1714-6
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-4673-1713-9
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-4673-1712-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84054
dc.description.abstractWhen computer-based tools are used for analysis of complex systems, the design of user interactions and interfaces becomes an essential part of development that determines the overall quality. The objective of this study is to investigate the processes and results of user interactions with integrated analysis tools to synthesize design implications for future tool development. In this study, two space exploration logistics tools are compared in a controlled user experiment. Through a comparative usability analysis, this study evaluated user performance and perception to provide design implications for future integrated analysis tools. For a comprehensive evaluation, multiple methods were used for data collection, including observation, questionnaire and interview. In addition to a result-oriented performance analysis, a process-oriented approach was used for analyzing patterns in user behaviors and errors. Results are presented with reference to the related features embedded in the interfaces of the two tools. Based on the comparative results, synthesized design insights for hierarchical structure, model transparency, automation, and visualization and feedback are discussed for integrated analysis tools in general.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAmerican Society for Engineering Education. National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowshipen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2012.6377840en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/en_US
dc.sourceProf. de Weck via Angie Locknaren_US
dc.titleProcess-oriented evaluation of user interactions in integrated system analysis toolsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationLee, Chaiwoo, Paul T. Grogan, and Olivier L. de Weck. “Process-oriented evaluation of user interactions in integrated system analysis tools.” In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 888-893. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2012.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Divisionen_US
dc.contributor.approverde Weck, Olivieren_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorLee, Chaiwooen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorGrogan, Paul Thomasen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorde Weck, Olivier L.en_US
dc.relation.journalProceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaperen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsLee, Chaiwoo; Grogan, Paul T.; Weck, Olivier L. deen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8835-4190
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6677-383X
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8986-4806
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record