Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSkow, Bradford
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T19:30:25Z
dc.date.available2014-03-14T19:30:25Z
dc.date.issued2013-05
dc.date.submitted2013-03
dc.identifier.issn0004-8402
dc.identifier.issn1471-6828
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/85652
dc.description.abstract‘Those ice cubes melted because by melting total entropy increased and entropy increase has a very high objective chance.’ What role does the chance in this explanation play? I argue that it contributes to the explanation by entailing that the melting was almost necessary, and defend the claim that the fact that some event was almost necessary can, in the right circumstances, constitute a causal explanation of that event.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2013.790913en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceMIT web domainen_US
dc.titleThe Role of Chance in Explanationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationSkow, Bradford. “The Role of Chance in Explanation.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92, no. 1 (January 2, 2014): 103–123.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorSkow, Bradforden_US
dc.relation.journalAustralasian Journal of Philosophyen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsSkow, Bradforden_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7892-4540
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record