Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBosques, Carlos J.
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Brian E.
dc.contributor.authorMeador, James W.
dc.contributor.authorSarvaiya, Hetal
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Jennifer L.
dc.contributor.authorDelloRusso, Guy
dc.contributor.authorBulik, Dorota A.
dc.contributor.authorHsu, I-Hsuan
dc.contributor.authorWashburn, Nathaniel
dc.contributor.authorSipsey, Sandra F.
dc.contributor.authorMyette, James R.
dc.contributor.authorRaman, Rahul
dc.contributor.authorSasisekharan, Ram
dc.contributor.authorVenkataraman, Ganesh
dc.contributor.authorShriver, Zachary H.
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-25T17:55:27Z
dc.date.available2014-08-25T17:55:27Z
dc.date.issued2010-11
dc.identifier.issn1087-0156
dc.identifier.issn1546-1696
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/89032
dc.description.abstractChinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells are widely used for the manufacture of biotherapeutics, in part because of their ability to produce proteins with desirable properties, including 'human-like' glycosylation profiles. For biotherapeutics production, control of glycosylation is critical because it has a profound effect on protein function, including half-life and efficacy. Additionally, specific glycan structures may adversely affect their safety profile. For example, the terminal galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-Gal) antigen can react with circulating anti α-Gal antibodies present in most individuals. It is now understood that murine cell lines, such as SP2 or NSO, typical manufacturing cell lines for biotherapeutics, contain the necessary biosynthetic machinery to produce proteins containing α-Gal epitopes. Furthermore, the majority of adverse clinical events associated with an induced IgE-mediated anaphylaxis response in patients treated with the commercial antibody Erbitux (cetuximab) manufactured in a murine myeloma cell line have been attributed to the presence of the α-Gal moiety. Even so, it is generally accepted that CHO cells lack the biosynthetic machinery to synthesize glycoproteins with α-Gal antigens. Contrary to this assumption, we report here the identification of the CHO ortholog of N-acetyllactosaminide 3-α-galactosyltransferase-1, which is responsible for the synthesis of the α-Gal epitope. We find that the enzyme product of this CHO gene is active and that glycosylated protein products produced in CHO contain the signature α-Gal antigen because of the action of this enzyme. Furthermore, characterizing the commercial therapeutic protein abatacept (Orencia) manufactured in CHO cell lines, we also identified the presence of α-Gal. Finally, we find that the presence of the α-Gal epitope likely arises during clonal selection because different subclonal populations from the same parental cell line differ in their expression of this gene. Although the specific levels of α-Gal required to trigger anaphylaxis reactions are not known and are likely product specific, the fact that humans contain high levels of circulating anti-α-Gal antibodies suggests that minimizing (or at least controlling) the levels of these epitopes during biotherapeutics development may be beneficial to patients. Furthermore, the approaches described here to monitor α-Gal levels may prove useful in industry for the surveillance and control of α-Gal levels during protein manufacture.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Center for Research Resources (U.S.) (Grant P41 RR018501-01)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherNature Publishing Groupen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1110-1153en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.titleChinese hamster ovary cells can produce galactose-α-1,3-galactose antigens on proteinsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationBosques, Carlos J, Brian E Collins, James W Meador, Hetal Sarvaiya, Jennifer L Murphy, Guy DelloRusso, Dorota A Bulik, et al. “Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells Can Produce Galactose-α-1,3-Galactose Antigens on Proteins.” Nature Biotechnology 28, no. 11 (November 2010): 1153–1156.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biological Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MITen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorRaman, Rahulen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorShriver, Zachary H.en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorSasisekharan, Ramen_US
dc.relation.journalNature Biotechnologyen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsBosques, Carlos J; Collins, Brian E; Meador, James W; Sarvaiya, Hetal; Murphy, Jennifer L; DelloRusso, Guy; Bulik, Dorota A; Hsu, I-Hsuan; Washburn, Nathaniel; Sipsey, Sandra F; Myette, James R; Raman, Rahul; Shriver, Zachary; Sasisekharan, Ram; Venkataraman, Ganeshen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9344-0205
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2085-7840
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record