Cell-State Transitions Regulated by SLUG Are Critical for Tissue Regeneration and Tumor Initiation
Author(s)
Phillips, Sarah; Prat, Aleix; Sedic, Maja; Proia, Theresa; Wronski, Ania; Mazumdar, Sohini; Skibinski, Adam; Shirley, Stephanie H.; Perou, Charles M.; Gill, Grace; Kuperwasser, Charlotte; Gupta, Piyush; ... Show more Show less
DownloadPhillips-2014-Cell-state transitio.pdf (3.723Mb)
PUBLISHER_CC
Publisher with Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Perturbations in stem cell activity and differentiation can lead to developmental defects and cancer. We use an approach involving a quantitative model of cell-state transitions in vitro to gain insights into how SLUG/SNAI2, a key developmental transcription factor, modulates mammary epithelial stem cell activity and differentiation in vivo. In the absence of SLUG, stem cells fail to transition into basal progenitor cells, while existing basal progenitor cells undergo luminal differentiation; together, these changes result in abnormal mammary architecture and defects in tissue function. Furthermore, we show that in the absence of SLUG, mammary stem cell activity necessary for tissue regeneration and cancer initiation is lost. Mechanistically, SLUG regulates differentiation and cellular plasticity by recruiting the chromatin modifier lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) to promoters of lineage-specific genes to repress transcription. Together, these results demonstrate that SLUG plays a dual role in repressing luminal epithelial differentiation while unlocking stem cell transitions necessary for tumorigenesis.
Date issued
2014-04Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biology; Whitehead Institute for Biomedical ResearchJournal
Stem Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier
Citation
Phillips, Sarah, Aleix Prat, Maja Sedic, Theresa Proia, Ania Wronski, Sohini Mazumdar, Adam Skibinski, et al. “Cell-State Transitions Regulated by SLUG Are Critical for Tissue Regeneration and Tumor Initiation.” Stem Cell Reports 2, no. 5 (May 2014): 633–647.
Version: Final published version
ISSN
22136711