Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOlesnavage, Kathryn
dc.contributor.authorWinter, Amos
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-26T17:25:21Z
dc.date.available2015-08-26T17:25:21Z
dc.date.issued2014-08
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-7918-4636-0
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/98256
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents an analysis of the rollover shape and energy storage and return in a prosthetic foot made from a compliant cantilevered beam. The rollover shape of a prosthetic foot is defined as the path of the center of pressure along the bottom of the foot during stance phase of gait, from heel strike to toe off. This path is rotated into the reference frame of the ankle-knee segment of the leg, which is held fixed. In order to achieve correct limb loading and gait kinematics, it is important that a prosthetic foot both mimic the physiological rollover shape and maximize energy storage and return. The majority of prosthetic feet available on the market are cantilever beam-type feet that emulate ankle dorsiflexion through beam bending. In this study, we show analytically that a prosthetic foot consisting of a beam with constant or monotonically decreasing cross-section cannot replicate physiological rollover shape; the foot is either too stiff when the ground reaction force (GRF) acts near the ankle, or too compliant when the GRF acts near the toe. A rigid constraint is required to prevent the foot from over-deflecting. Using finite element analysis (FEA), we investigated how closely a cantilever beam with constrained maximum deflection could mimic physiological rollover shape and energy storage/return during stance phase. A constrained beam with constant cross-section is able to replicate physiological rollover shape with R[superscript 2] = 0.86. The ratio of the strain energy stored and returned by the beam compared to the ideal energy storage and return is 0.504. This paper determines that there is a trade off between rollover shape and energy storage and return in cantilever beam-type prosthetic feet. The method and results presented in this paper demonstrate a useful tool in early stage prosthetic foot design that can be used to predict the rollover shape and energy storage of any type of prosthetic foot.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMIT Tata Center for Technology and Designen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMIT International Science and Technology Initiatives (India Innovation Fund)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherASME Internationalen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1115/DETC2014-35174en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceProf. Winter via Angie Locknaren_US
dc.titleAnalysis of Rollover Shape and Energy Storage and Return in Cantilever Beam-Type Prosthetic Feeten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationOlesnavage, Kathryn M., and Amos G. Winter. “Analysis of Rollover Shape and Energy Storage and Return in Cantilever Beam-Type Prosthetic Feet.” Volume 5A: 38th Mechanisms and Robotics Conference (August 17, 2014).en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorOlesnavage, Kathrynen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorWinter, Amosen_US
dc.relation.journalVolume 5A: 38th Mechanisms and Robotics Conferenceen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaperen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsOlesnavage, Kathryn M.; Winter, Amos G.en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4151-0889
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2940-2383
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record