Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOffenhuber, Dietmar
dc.contributor.authorLee, David
dc.contributor.authorWolf, Malima I.
dc.contributor.authorPhithakkitnukoon, Santi
dc.contributor.authorBiderman, Assaf
dc.contributor.authorRatti, Carlo
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-08T00:47:35Z
dc.date.available2016-03-08T00:47:35Z
dc.date.issued2012-05
dc.identifier.issn0194-4363
dc.identifier.issn1939-0130
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/101625
dc.description.abstractProblem, research strategy, and findings: Reliable information on trash disposal is crucial but becomes difficult as waste removal chains grow increasingly complex. Lack of firm data on the spatial behavior of waste hampers effective recycling strategy design. In particular, the environmental impact of electronic and household hazardous waste is poorly understood. Our study investigates waste processing in an environmental, economic, and geographic context, using novel methods to track municipal solid waste in the city of Seattle (WA). We observed the movement of 2,000 discarded items using attached active GPS sensors, recording an unprecedented spatial dataset of waste trajectories. We both qualitatively identified facilities visited along each item's trajectory, then statistical modeled characteristic transportation distance and the likelihood of ending up at a specific type of facility by product categories, place of disposal, and collection mechanism. We show that a) electronic and household hazardous waste items travel significantly longer and have more arbitrary trajectories than other types of waste and b) that existing models for waste emissions may underestimate the environmental impact of transportation by not accounting for very long trajectories. Takeaway for practice: Transportation costs and emissions may diminish the value of recycling. Collection strategies deserve closer attention given the long distances over which they operate. Electronic tracking could provide data for evaluating waste management systems.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2012.677120en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceMIT web domainen_US
dc.titlePutting matter in place: tradeoffs between recycling and distance in planning for waste disposalen_US
dc.title.alternativePutting Matter in Place: Measuring Tradeoffs in Waste Disposal and Recyclingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationOffenhuber, Dietmar, David Lee, Malima I. Wolf, Santi Phithakkitnukoon, Assaf Biderman, and Carlo Ratti. “Putting Matter in Place.” Journal of the American Planning Association 78, no. 2 (April 2012): 173–196.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planningen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. SENSEable City Laboratoryen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorOffenhuber, Dietmaren_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorLee, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorWolf, Malima I.en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorPhithakkitnukoon, Santien_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorBiderman, Assafen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorRatti, Carloen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of the American Planning Associationen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsOffenhuber, Dietmar; Lee, David; Wolf, Malima I.; Phithakkitnukoon, Santi; Biderman, Assaf; Ratti, Carloen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0447-8573
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2026-5631
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record