Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNeben, Abraham Richard
dc.contributor.authorLonsdale, Colin John
dc.contributor.authorMcWhirter, Stephen R.
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Christopher Leigh
dc.contributor.authorHewitt, Jacqueline N
dc.contributor.authorDillon, Joshua Shane
dc.contributor.authorCappallo, Roger J
dc.contributor.authorCorey, Brian E
dc.contributor.authorGoeke, Robert F
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Edward H
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-24T23:44:46Z
dc.date.available2016-05-24T23:44:46Z
dc.date.issued2016-03
dc.date.submitted2015-10
dc.identifier.issn1538-4357
dc.identifier.issn0004-637X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102669
dc.description.abstractAccurate antenna beam models are critical for radio observations aiming to isolate the redshifted 21 cm spectral line emission from the Dark Ages and the Epoch of Reionization (EOR) and unlock the scientific potential of 21 cm cosmology. Past work has focused on characterizing mean antenna beam models using either satellite signals or astronomical sources as calibrators, but antenna-to-antenna variation due to imperfect instrumentation has remained unexplored. We characterize this variation for the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) through laboratory measurements and simulations, finding typical deviations of the order of ±10%–20% near the edges of the main lobe and in the sidelobes. We consider the ramifications of these results for image- and power spectrum-based science. In particular, we simulate visibilities measured by a 100 m baseline and find that using an otherwise perfect foreground model, unmodeled beam-forming errors severely limit foreground subtraction accuracy within the region of Fourier space contaminated by foreground emission (the "wedge"). This region likely contains much of the cosmological signal, and accessing it will require measurement of per-antenna beam patterns. However, unmodeled beam-forming errors do not contaminate the Fourier space region expected to be free of foreground contamination (the "EOR window"), showing that foreground avoidance remains a viable strategy.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (U.S.) (Grant AST-0821321)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMarble Astrophysics Funden_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMassachusetts Institute of Technology. School of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisheriopen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3847/0004-637x/820/1/44en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceIOP Publishingen_US
dc.titleBEAM-FORMING ERRORS IN MURCHISON WIDEFIELD ARRAY PHASED ARRAY ANTENNAS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON EPOCH OF REIONIZATION SCIENCEen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationNeben, Abraham R., Jacqueline N. Hewitt, Richard F. Bradley, Joshua S. Dillon, G. Bernardi, J. D. Bowman, F. Briggs, et al. “BEAM-FORMING ERRORS IN MURCHISON WIDEFIELD ARRAY PHASED ARRAY ANTENNAS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON EPOCH OF REIONIZATION SCIENCE.” The Astrophysical Journal 820, no. 1 (March 17, 2016): 44. © 2016 The American Astronomical Societyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHaystack Observatoryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physicsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Researchen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorNeben, Abraham Richarden_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorHewitt, Jacqueline N.en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorDillon, Joshua S.en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorCappallo, Roger J.en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorCorey, Brian E.en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorGoeke, Robert F.en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorLonsdale, Colin Johnen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorMcWhirter, Stephen R.en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorMorgan, Edward H.en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorWilliams, Christopher Leighen_US
dc.relation.journalThe Astrophysical Journalen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsNeben, Abraham R.; Hewitt, Jacqueline N.; Bradley, Richard F.; Dillon, Joshua S.; Bernardi, G.; Bowman, J. D.; Briggs, F.; Cappallo, R. J.; Corey, B. E.; Deshpande, A. A.; Goeke, R.; Greenhill, L. J.; Hazelton, B. J.; Johnston-Hollitt, M.; Kaplan, D. L.; Lonsdale, C. J.; McWhirter, S. R.; Mitchell, D. A.; Morales, M. F.; Morgan, E.; Oberoi, D.; Ord, S. M.; Prabu, T.; Shankar, N. Udaya; Srivani, K. S.; Subrahmanyan, R.; Tingay, S. J.; Wayth, R. B.; Webster, R. L.; Williams, A.; Williams, C. L.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4117-570X
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7776-7240
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7130-208X
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3336-9958
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record