Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVarela, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorKumar, S.
dc.contributor.authorYang, J. Y.
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Matthew A.
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-25T18:07:38Z
dc.date.available2016-05-25T18:07:38Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-25
dc.date.issued2013-04
dc.identifier.issn1863-2653en_US
dc.identifier.issn1863-2661en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102682
dc.description.abstractThe reuniens nucleus in the midline thalamus projects to the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the hippocampus, and has been suggested to modulate interactions between these regions, such as spindle–ripple correlations during sleep and theta band coherence during exploratory behavior. Feedback from the hippocampus to the nucleus reuniens has received less attention but has the potential to influence thalamocortical networks as a function of hippocampal activation. We used the retrograde tracer cholera toxin B conjugated to two fluorophores to study thalamic projections to the dorsal and ventral hippocampus and to the prelimbic and infralimbic subregions of mPFC. We also examined the feedback connections from the hippocampus to reuniens. The goal was to evaluate the anatomical basis for direct coordination between reuniens, mPFC, and hippocampus by looking for double-labeled cells in reuniens and hippocampus. In confirmation of previous reports, the nucleus reuniens was the origin of most thalamic afferents to the dorsal hippocampus, whereas both reuniens and the lateral dorsal nucleus projected to ventral hippocampus. Feedback from hippocampus to reuniens originated primarily in the dorsal and ventral subiculum. Thalamic cells with collaterals to mPFC and hippocampus were found in reuniens, across its anteroposterior axis, and represented, on average, about 8 % of the labeled cells in reuniens. Hippocampal cells with collaterals to mPFC and reuniens were less common (~1 % of the labeled subicular cells), and located in the molecular layer of the subiculum. The results indicate that a subset of reuniens cells can directly coordinate activity in mPFC and hippocampus. Cells with collaterals in the hippocampus–reuniens–mPFC network may be important for the systems consolidation of memory traces and for theta synchronization during exploratory behavior.
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (grant 5R01MH061976)
dc.description.sponsorshipCaja Madrid Foundation (Fellowship)
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlag
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00429-013-0543-5en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.titleAnatomical substrates for direct interactions between hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex, and the thalamic nucleus reuniensen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationVarela, C., S. Kumar, J. Y. Yang, and M. A. Wilson. “Anatomical Substrates for Direct Interactions Between Hippocampus, Medial Prefrontal Cortex, and the Thalamic Nucleus Reuniens.” Brain Struct Funct 219, no. 3 (April 10, 2013): 911–929.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
dc.contributor.departmentPicower Institute for Learning and Memory
dc.contributor.mitauthorVarela, Carmen
dc.contributor.mitauthorKumar, S.
dc.contributor.mitauthorYang, J. Y.
dc.contributor.mitauthorWilson, Matthew A.
dc.relation.journalBrain Structure and Functionen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsVarela, C.; Kumar, S.; Yang, J. Y.; Wilson, M. A.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7149-3584
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record