Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChan, Kevin E.
dc.contributor.authorEdelman, Elazer R.
dc.contributor.authorWenger, Julia B.
dc.contributor.authorThadhani, Ravi I.
dc.contributor.authorMaddux, Franklin W.
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-03T18:14:20Z
dc.date.available2016-06-03T18:14:20Z
dc.date.issued2015-01
dc.date.submitted2014-01
dc.identifier.issn0009-7322
dc.identifier.issn1524-4539
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102945
dc.descriptionavailable in PMC 2016 March 17en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground—Dabigatran and rivaroxaban are new oral anticoagulants that are eliminated through the kidneys. Their use in dialysis patients is discouraged because these drugs can bioaccumulate to precipitate inadvertent bleeding. We wanted to determine whether prescription of dabigatran or rivaroxaban was occurring in the dialysis population and whether these practices were safe. Methods and Results—Prevalence plots were used to describe the point prevalence (monthly) of dabigatran and rivaroxaban use among 29 977 hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation. Poisson regression compared the rate of bleeding, stroke, and arterial embolism in patients who started dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin. The first record of dabigatran prescription among hemodialysis patients occurred 45 days after the drug became available in the United States. Since then, dabigatran and rivaroxaban use in the atrial fibrillation–end-stage renal disease population has steadily risen where 5.9% of anticoagulated dialysis patients are started on dabigatrian or rivaroxaban. In covariate adjusted Poisson regression, dabigatran (rate ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.21–1.81; P=0.0001) and rivaroxaban (rate ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.03–1.83; P=0.04) associated with a higher risk of hospitalization or death from bleeding when compared with warfarin. The risk of hemorrhagic death was even larger with dabigatran (rate ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.18–2.68; P=0.006) and rivaroxaban (rate ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.94–3.12; P=0.07) relative to warfarin. There were too few events in the study to detect meaningful differences in stroke and arterial embolism between the drug groups. Conclusions—More dialysis patients are being started on dabigatran and rivaroxaban, even when their use is contraindicated and there are no studies to support that the benefits outweigh the risks of these drugs in end-stage renal disease.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (NIH grant R01 GM-49039)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Heart Associationen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.114.014113en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.titleDabigatran and Rivaroxaban Use in Atrial Fibrillation Patients on Hemodialysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationChan, Kevin E., Elazer R. Edelman, Julia B. Wenger, Ravi I. Thadhani, and Franklin W. Maddux. "Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban Use in Atrial Fibrillation Patients on Hemodialysis." Circulation. 2015; 131: 972-979.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Medical Engineering & Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorEdelman, Elazer R.en_US
dc.relation.journalCirculationen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsChan, K. E.; Edelman, E. R.; Wenger, J. B.; Thadhani, R. I.; Maddux, F. W.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7832-7156
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record