Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRayo, Agustin
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-01T19:14:14Z
dc.date.available2016-07-01T19:14:14Z
dc.date.issued2014-12
dc.identifier.issn0031-8116
dc.identifier.issn1573-0883
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103512
dc.description.abstractDan Greco and Jason Turner wrote two fantastic critiques of my book, The Construction of Logical Space. Greco’s critique suggests that the book can be given a Kuhnian interpretation, with a Carnapian twist. Here I embrace that interpretation. Turner criticizes one of the views I develop in the book. Here I identify an avenue of resistance.en_US
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlandsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0426-5en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSpringer Netherlandsen_US
dc.titleReplies to Greco and Turneren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationRayo, Agustin. “Replies to Greco and Turner.” Philosophical Studies 172, no. 10 (December 24, 2014): 2617–2620.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorRayo, Agustinen_US
dc.relation.journalPhilosophical Studiesen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2016-05-23T12:07:55Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
dspace.orderedauthorsRayo, Agustinen_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1847-2770
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record