Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHight, Ariel Edward
dc.contributor.authorKozin, Elliott D.
dc.contributor.authorDarrow, Keith
dc.contributor.authorLehmann, Ashton
dc.contributor.authorBoyden, Edward Stuart
dc.contributor.authorBrown, M. Christian
dc.contributor.authorLee, Daniel J.
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-07T19:56:49Z
dc.date.available2016-07-07T19:56:49Z
dc.date.issued2015-01
dc.date.submitted2014-11
dc.identifier.issn03785955
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103542
dc.descriptionAvailable in PMC 2015 June 14en_US
dc.description.abstractContemporary auditory brainstem implant (ABI) performance is limited by reliance on electrical neurostimulation with its accompanying channel cross talk and current spread to non-auditory neurons. A new generation ABI based on optogenetic technology may ameliorate limitations fundamental to electrical stimulation. The most widely studied opsin is channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2); however, its relatively slow kinetic properties may prevent the encoding of auditory information at high stimulation rates. In the present study, we compare the temporal resolution of light-evoked responses of ChR2 to a recently developed fast opsin, Chronos, to ChR2 in a murine ABI model. Viral mediated gene transfer via a posterolateral craniotomy was used to express Chronos or ChR2 in the cochlear nucleus (CN). Following a four to eight week incubation period, blue light (473 nm) was delivered via an optical fiber placed directly on the surface of the infected CN, and neural activity was recorded in the contralateral inferior colliculus (IC). Both ChR2 and Chronos evoked sustained responses to all stimuli, even at high pulse rates. In addition, optical stimulation evoked excitatory responses throughout the tonotopic axis of the IC. Synchrony of the light-evoked response to stimulus rates of 14–448 pulses/s was higher in Chronos compared to ChR2 mice (p < 0.05 at 56, 168, and 224 pulses/s). Our results demonstrate that Chronos has the ability to drive the auditory system at higher stimulation rates than ChR2 and may be a more ideal opsin for manipulation of auditory pathways in future optogenetic-based neuroprostheses.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2015.01.004en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.titleTemporal Resolution of ChR2 and Chronos in an Optogenetic-based Auditory Brainstem Implant Model: Implications for the Development and Application of Auditory Opsinsen_US
dc.title.alternativeSuperior temporal resolution of Chronos versus channelrhodopsin-2 in an optogenetic model of the auditory brainstem implanten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationHight, Ariel Edward, Elliott D. Kozin, Keith Darrow, Ashton Lehmann, Edward Boyden, M. Christian Brown, and Daniel J. Lee. “Superior Temporal Resolution of Chronos Versus Channelrhodopsin-2 in an Optogenetic Model of the Auditory Brainstem Implant.” Hearing Research 322 (April 2015): 235–241.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratoryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMcGovern Institute for Brain Research at MITen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorBoyden, Edward Stuarten_US
dc.relation.journalHearing Researchen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsHight, Ariel Edward; Kozin, Elliott D.; Darrow, Keith; Lehmann, Ashton; Boyden, Edward; Brown, M. Christian; Lee, Daniel J.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0419-3351
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record