Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPotter, Mary C.
dc.contributor.authorHagmann, Carl Erick
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-29T19:43:45Z
dc.date.available2016-07-29T19:43:45Z
dc.date.issued2014-07
dc.identifier.issn1069-9384
dc.identifier.issn1531-5320
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103808
dc.description.abstractPictured objects and scenes can be understood in a brief glimpse, but there is a debate about whether they are first encoded at the basic level (e.g., banana), as proposed by Rosch et al. (1976, Cognitive Psychology) , or at a superordinate level (e.g., fruit). The level at which we first categorize an object matters in everyday situations because it determines whether we approach, avoid, or ignore the object. In the present study, we limited stimulus duration in order to explore the earliest level of object understanding. Target objects were presented among five other pictures using RSVP at 80, 53, 27, or 13 ms/picture. On each trial, participants viewed or heard 1 of 28 superordinate names or a corresponding basic-level name of the target. The name appeared before or after the picture sequence. Detection (as d′) improved as duration increased but was significantly above chance in all conditions and for all durations. When the name was given before the sequence, d′ was higher for the basic than for the superordinate name, showing that specific advance information facilitated visual encoding. In the name-after group, performance on the two category levels did not differ significantly; this suggests that encoding had occurred at the basic level during presentation, allowing the superordinate category to be inferred. We interpret the results as being consistent with the claim that the basic level is usually the entry level for object perception.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant MH47432)en_US
dc.publisherSpringer USen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0692-4en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSpringer USen_US
dc.titleBanana or fruit? Detection and recognition across categorical levels in RSVPen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationPotter, Mary C., and Carl Erick Hagmann. “Banana or Fruit? Detection and Recognition Across Categorical Levels in RSVP.” Psychon Bull Rev 22, no. 2 (July 24, 2014): 578–585.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorPotter, Mary C.en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorHagmann, Carl Ericken_US
dc.relation.journalPsychonomic Bulletin & Reviewen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2016-05-23T12:18:07Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderPsychonomic Society, Inc.
dspace.orderedauthorsPotter, Mary C.; Hagmann, Carl Ericken_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5781-756X
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record