Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWeinstein, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorYildiz, Muhamet
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-29T16:18:47Z
dc.date.available2016-08-29T16:18:47Z
dc.date.issued2016-01
dc.identifier.issn19336837
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/104059
dc.description.abstractIn the reputation literature, players have commitment types, which represent the possibility that they do not have standard payoffs, but instead are constrained to follow a particular plan. In this paper, we show that arbitrary commitment types can emerge from incomplete information about the stage payoffs. In particular, any finitely repeated game with commitment types is strategically equivalent to a standard finitely repeated game with incomplete information about the stage payoffs. Then classic reputation results can be achieved with uncertainty concerning only the stage payoffs.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3982/TE1893en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/en_US
dc.sourceSociety for Economic Theoryen_US
dc.titleReputation without commitment in finitely repeated gamesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationWeinstein, Jonathan, and Muhamet Yildiz. "Reputation without commitment in finitely repeated games." Theoretical Economics 11 (2016), 157-185.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economicsen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorYildiz, Muhameten_US
dc.relation.journalTheoretical Economicsen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7637-7117
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record