Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoetz, Celine
dc.contributor.authorRotman, Stephen R.
dc.contributor.authorBishop, Tara F.
dc.contributor.authorHartoularos, George C.
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-06T17:49:03Z
dc.date.available2016-10-06T17:49:03Z
dc.date.issued2015-02
dc.identifier.issn0884-8734
dc.identifier.issn1525-1497
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/104651
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: While studies have been published in the last 30 years that examine the effect of charge display during physician decision-making, no analysis or synthesis of these studies has been conducted. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the type and quality of charge display studies that have been published; to synthesize this information in the form of a literature review. METHODS: English-language articles published between 1982 and 2013 were identified using MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge, ABI-Inform, and Academic Search Premier. Article titles, abstracts, and text were reviewed for relevancy by two authors. Data were then extracted and subsequently synthesized and analyzed. RESULTS: Seventeen articles were identified that fell into two topic categories: the effect of charge display on radiology and laboratory test ordering versus on medication choice. Seven articles were randomized controlled trials, eight were pre-intervention vs. post-intervention studies, and two interventions had a concurrent control and intervention groups, but were not randomized. Twelve studies were conducted in a clinical environment, whereas five were survey studies. Of the nine clinically based interventions that examined test ordering, seven had statistically significant reductions in cost and/or the number of tests ordered. Two of the three clinical studies looking at medication expenditures found significant reductions in cost. In the survey studies, physicians consistently chose fewer tests or lower cost options in the theoretical scenarios presented. CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of studies, charge information changed ordering and prescribing behavior.en_US
dc.publisherSpringer USen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3226-5en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceSpringer USen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Charge Display on Cost of Care and Physician Practice Behaviors: A Systematic Reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationGoetz, Celine, Stephen R. Rotman, George Hartoularos, and Tara F. Bishop. “The Effect of Charge Display on Cost of Care and Physician Practice Behaviors: A Systematic Review.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 30, no. 6 (February 18, 2015): 835–842.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorHartoularos, George C.
dc.relation.journalJournal of General Internal Medicineen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2016-08-18T15:45:20Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderSociety of General Internal Medicine
dspace.orderedauthorsGoetz, Celine; Rotman, Stephen R.; Hartoularos, George; Bishop, Tara F.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record