Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHare, Caspar
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-19T19:06:11Z
dc.date.available2016-10-19T19:06:11Z
dc.date.issued2011-07
dc.identifier.issn0014-1704
dc.identifier.issn1539-297X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/104861
dc.description.abstractMany philosophers writing about death have adopted a strikingly cheery and optimistic tone. Their goal has been to show us that, though we may lack immortal souls, we should still regard the oblivion hurtling toward us with a calm and steady eye. Some of these philosophers have tried to convince us that nonexistence is not so dreadful a thing. The Epicureans invoked a variety of ingenious arguments to this conclusion, the most famous being this: it makes sense for you to fear death only if it is bad for you to be dead. But it is not bad for you to be dead. Your death is the end of you. After the event there is no you for things to be good or bad for. More recently, Bernard Williams (in “The Makropulos Case: Reflections on the Tedium of Immortality,” in Problems of the Self [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973]) had a more nuanced argument: a finite life is not so bad when you consider the alternative, an infinite life. An infinite life either would become tedious to the point of having no value, or would involve so much psychological change that the vibrant existence of later incarnations of the infinite being would not satisfy any desire to survive on the part of earlier incarnations of the infinite being.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Chicago Pressen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1086/660789en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceUniversity of Chicago Pressen_US
dc.titleBradley, Ben. Well-Being and Death.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationHare, Caspar. “Bradley, Ben. Well-Being and Death .” Ethics vol. 121, no. 4, July 2011, pp. 797–799.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorHare, Caspar
dc.relation.journalEthicsen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsHare, Casparen_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7659-7454
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record