Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKotnik, Tadej
dc.contributor.authorWeaver, James C
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-27T21:54:58Z
dc.date.available2017-03-01T16:14:49Z
dc.date.issued2016-04
dc.date.submitted2016-02
dc.identifier.issn0022-2631
dc.identifier.issn1432-1424
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/105121
dc.description.abstractPhylogenetic studies reveal that horizontal gene transfer (HGT) plays a prominent role in evolution and genetic variability of life. Five biotic mechanisms of HGT among prokaryotic organisms have been extensively characterized: conjugation, competence, transduction, gene transfer agent particles, and transitory fusion with recombination, but it is not known whether they can account for all natural HGT. It is even less clear how HGT could have occurred before any of these mechanisms had developed. Here, we consider contemporary conditions and experiments on microorganisms to estimate possible roles of abiotic HGT—currently and throughout evolution. Candidate mechanisms include freeze-and-thaw, microbeads-agitation, and electroporation-based transformation, and we posit that these laboratory techniques have analogues in nature acting as mechanisms of abiotic HGT: freeze-and-thaw cycles in polar waters, agitation by sand at foreshores and riverbeds, and lightning-triggered electroporation in near-surface aqueous habitats. We derive conservative order-of-magnitude estimates for rates of microorganisms subjected to freeze-and-thaw cycles, sand agitation, and lightning-triggered electroporation, at 1024, 1019, and 1017 per year, respectively. Considering the yield of viable transformants, which is by far the highest in electroporation, we argue this may still favor lightning-triggered transformation over the other two mechanisms. Electroporation-based gene transfer also appears to be the most general of these abiotic candidates, and perhaps even of all known HGT mechanisms. Future studies should provide improved estimates of gene transfer rates and cell viability, currently and in the past, but to assess the importance of abiotic HGT in nature will likely require substantial progress—also in knowledge of biotic HGT.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant 5RO1GM63857)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Air Force Office of Scientific Research. Multidisciplinary University Research Initiativeen_US
dc.publisherSpringer USen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00232-016-9897-yen_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceSpringer USen_US
dc.titleAbiotic Gene Transfer: Rare or Rampant?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationKotnik, Tadej, and James C. Weaver. “Abiotic Gene Transfer: Rare or Rampant?” The Journal of Membrane Biology 249.5 (2016): 623–631.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute for Medical Engineering and Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorWeaver, James C
dc.relation.journalThe Journal of Membrane Biologyen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2016-08-18T15:41:03Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderSpringer Science+Business Media New York
dspace.orderedauthorsKotnik, Tadej; Weaver, James C.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9016-5962
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record