Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSwaminathan, Jaichander
dc.contributor.authorChung, Hyung Won
dc.contributor.authorWarsinger, David Elan Martin
dc.contributor.authorLienhard, John H
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-08T20:57:48Z
dc.date.available2016-12-08T20:57:48Z
dc.date.issued2016-10
dc.date.submitted2016-08
dc.identifier.issn03062619
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/105758
dc.description.abstractImproving the energy efficiency of membrane distillation (MD) is essential for its widespread adoption for renewable energy driven desalination systems. Here, an energy efficiency framework for membrane distillation modules is developed based on heat exchanger theory, and with this an accurate but vastly simplified numerical model for MD efficiency and flux is derived. This heat exchanger analogy shows that membrane distillation systems may be characterized using non-dimensional parameters from counter-flow heat exchanger (HX) theory such as effectiveness (εε) and number of transfer units (NTU). Along with the commonly used MD thermal efficiency (ηη), “MD effectiveness” ε should be used to understand the energy efficiency (measured as gained output ratio, GOR) and water vapor flux of single stage membrane distillation systems. GOR increases linearly with ηη (due to decreasing conduction losses), but increases more rapidly with an increase in εε (better heat recovery). Using the proposed theoretical framework, the performance of different single stage MD configurations is compared for seawater desalination. The gap between the membrane and the condensing surface constitutes the major resistance in both air gap (AGMD) and permeate gap (PGMD) systems (75% of the total in AGMD and 50% in PGMD). Reducing the gap resistance by increasing gap conductance (conductive gap MD (CGMD)), leads to an increase in εε through an increase in NTU, and only a small decrease in ηη, resulting in about two times higher overall GOR. GOR of direct contact MD (DCMD) is limited by the size of the external heat exchanger, and can be as high as that of CGMD only if the heat exchanger area is about 7 times larger than the membrane. While MD membrane design should focus on increasing the membrane’s permeability and reducing its conductance to achieve higher ηη, module design for seawater desalination should focus on increasing ε by reducing the major resistance to heat transfer. A simplified model to predict system GOR and water vapor flux of PGMD, CGMD and DCMD, without employing finite difference discretization, is presented. Computationally, the simplified HX model is several orders of magnitude faster than full numerical models and the results from the simplified model are within 11% of the results from more detailed simulations over a wide range of operating conditions.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMasdar Institute of Science and Technology/MIT/Abu Dhabi, UAE (Cooperative agreement, Reference no.02/MI/MI/ CP/11/07633/GEN/G/00)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.090en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceProf. Lienhard via Angie Locknaren_US
dc.titleMembrane distillation model based on heat exchanger theory and configuration comparisonen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationSwaminathan, Jaichander, Hyung Won Chung, David M. Warsinger, and John H. Lienhard V. “Membrane Distillation Model Based on Heat Exchanger Theory and Configuration Comparison.” Applied Energy 184 (December 2016): 491-505.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRohsenow Kendall Heat Transfer Laboratory (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)en_US
dc.contributor.approverLienhard, John H.en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorSwaminathan, Jaichander
dc.contributor.mitauthorChung, Hyung Won
dc.contributor.mitauthorWarsinger, David Elan Martin
dc.contributor.mitauthorLienhard, John H.
dc.relation.journalApplied Energyen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsSwaminathan, Jaichander; Chung, Hyung Won; Warsinger, David M.; Lienhard V, John H.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8375-2694
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3446-1473
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2901-0638
dspace.mitauthor.errortrue
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record