Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRyan, Brent D.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-09T16:38:42Z
dc.date.available2017-01-09T16:38:42Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.submitted2010
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-78190-593-7
dc.identifier.isbn1781905932
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/106290
dc.description.abstractThis chapter examines megaproject design and planning in two “shrinking cities”- Philadelphia, PA and Detroit, MI- concludes that megaproject "metastasis", or repeated expansions into surrounding urban fabrics, is promoting the reduction of downtown into a series of self-contained enclaves. While political coalitions are constructing megaprojects, or large public works and/or single buildings, in cities around the world, in the United States, single-building megaprojects motivated by “growth coalitions” of public and private development actors have proliferated in downtowns since 1990. The urban design impacts of these megaprojects on the surrounding urban fabric have been little studied. Data on the institutional history, physical expansion, and relationship of the megaprojects to the urban fabric is combined with a qualitative analysis of megaproject theory and its application to the American condition, as well as to the political economy of development in American shrinking cities. The chapter concludes that megaprojects such as convention centers and casinos tend to expand inexorably once they are introduced into the American downtown. This metastasis results in the destruction of existing older buildings and street networks, the consolidation of street blocks into ever-larger superblocks, and the eventual physical restructuring of downtowns into enclaves of older fabric amidst clusters of megaproject superblocks. Applying Jane Jacobs' theory of "moral hybrids” between “commerce and politics" to megaproject metastasis, the chapter argues that while megaprojects may be inevitable in American downtowns, they should be sited away from active, small-scale urban fabrics to reduce the negative impacts of future metastases. The chapter takes a design-oriented perspective on a phenomenon that is almost always understood from a political economy perspective alone. Megaprojects are significant physical entities, and I clarify their physical impacts on the urban fabric while indicating urban design policy directions to reduce these impacts in future.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Limiteden_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dusp.mit.edu/publication/metastasizing-megaproject-urban-design-and-monstrous-moral-hybrids-american-cityen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceMIT Web Domainen_US
dc.titleThe Metastasizing Megaproject: Urban design and ‘monstrous moral hybrids’ in the American city [Book Chapter]en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationRyan, Brent D. "The Metastasizing Megaproject: Urban design and "monstrous moral hybrids" in the American city". In Urban Megaprojects: A Worldwide View, Edited by Gerardo del Cerro Santamaría. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited (June 6, 2013). pp.1-20.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planningen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorRyan, Brent
dc.relation.journalUrban Megaprojects: A Worldwide Viewen_US
dc.eprint.versionOriginal manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/BookItemen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsRyan, Brent D.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0223-1887
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record