Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSwanson-Hysell, Nicholas L.
dc.contributor.authorCournède, Cécile
dc.contributor.authorTikoo, Sonia M.
dc.contributor.authorGattacceca, Jerome
dc.contributor.authorSuavet, Clement Romain
dc.contributor.authorWeiss, Benjamin P.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-13T21:33:37Z
dc.date.available2017-01-13T21:33:37Z
dc.date.issued2015-07
dc.date.submitted2015-07
dc.identifier.issn2169-9100
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/106491
dc.description.abstractAn understanding of the effects of hypervelocity impacts on the magnetization of natural samples is required for interpreting paleomagnetic records of meteorites, lunar rocks, and cratered planetary surfaces. Rocks containing ferromagnetic minerals have been shown to acquire shock remanent magnetization (SRM) due to the passage of a shock wave in the presence of an ambient magnetic field. In this study, we conducted pressure remanent magnetization (PRM) acquisition experiments on a variety of natural samples as an analog for SRM acquisition at pressures ranging up to 1.8 GPa. Comparison of the alternating field (AF) and thermal demagnetization behavior of PRM confirms that AF demagnetization is a more efficient method for removing SRM overprints than thermal demagnetization because SRM may persist to unblocking temperatures approaching the Curie temperatures of magnetic minerals. The blocking of SRM to high temperatures suggests that SRM could persist without being eradicated by viscous relaxation over geologic timescales. However, SRM has been rarely observed in natural samples likely because of two factors: (1) other forms of impact-related remanence (e.g., thermal remanent magnetization from impact-related heating or chemical remanent magnetization from postimpact hydrothermal activity) are often acquired by target rocks that overprint SRM, and (2) low SRM acquisition efficiencies may prevent SRM from being distinguished from the underlying primary remanence or other overprints due to its low magnetization intensity.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015JE004840en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceOther Repositoryen_US
dc.titlePreservation and detectability of shock-induced magnetizationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationTikoo, Sonia M. et al. “Preservation and Detectability of Shock-Induced Magnetization: PRESERVATION AND DETECTABILITY OF SRM.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 120.9 (2015): 1461–1475.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorGattacceca, Jerome
dc.contributor.mitauthorWeiss, Benjamin P
dc.contributor.mitauthorSuavet, Clement Romain
dc.relation.journalJournal of Geophysical Research: Planetsen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsTikoo, Sonia M.; Gattacceca, Jérôme; Swanson-Hysell, Nicholas L.; Weiss, Benjamin P.; Suavet, Clément; Cournède, Cécileen_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3113-3415
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record